>>7636970 Anons are weighing in on Gina. White hat. "…reserve judgement until they prove themselves worthy with their actions…" None of us know what worthy actions she has done, either recently or in the remote past. In addition, how does that article blurb implicate her as a bad guy? Gina=our girl.

>>7637236 Consider that she is helping Durham and our side take down Brennan. Look at the lineup of opposition players appointed by DJT. Keeping them close. Brennan may have had the same motivation with GH. Or he may be stupid, or just wildly misjudged the position. The entire contest that we are engaged in is murky, with many players having unclear motives. Agree that we do not know for sure where Gina stands on things, but to some of us, the overall picture is that she is with us.