Anonymous ID: 887cf8 Dec. 27, 2019, 8:59 p.m. No.7639075   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9085 >>9129

WIKILEAKS: Chemical Weapons Watchdog Ordered Deletion of ‘All Traces’ of Findings That Syrian ‘Chemical Attack’ May Have Been Staged

 

Wikileaks has published shocking leaked documents from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in which they covered up a dissenting report that concluded chemical weapons were not used in the Syrian city of Duoma last year. The latest release is the fourth batch of leaked documents that WikiLeaks has published from OPCW. In one of the leaked e-mail exchanges, from February 27-28, between members of the fact finding mission (FFM) deployed to Douma and senior officials of the OPCW, the watchdog’s Chief of Cabinet Sebastien Braha ordered the removal of “all traces” of a report by Ian Henderson. “Please get this document out of DRA [Documents Registry Archive]… And please remove all traces, if any, of its delivery/storage/whatever in DRA,” the email reads. Henderson had inspected the sites in Douma and two cylinders that were found on the site of the alleged attack. In his report, he had concluded that the cylinders were more likely placed there — not dropped. His findings heavily indicated that the “attack” was staged.

 

US media and politicians uncritically claimed that the cylinders were dropped from the air by the Syrian government, killing civilians. Since the cylinders appeared to be placed by hand, and the area was under the control of anti-government forces, Henderson’s findings lend credence to theories that the attack was staged to set up the Syrian president and prompt the US to attack.

 

WIKILEAKS: Chemical Weapons Watchdog Ordered Deletion of ‘All Traces’ of Findings That Syrian ‘Chemical Attack’ May Have Been Staged

Avatar by Cassandra Fairbanks December 27, 2019 148 Comments

 

275Share 184Tweet Email

 

Wikileaks has published shocking leaked documents from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in which they covered up a dissenting report that concluded chemical weapons were not used in the Syrian city of Duoma last year.

 

The latest release is the fourth batch of leaked documents that WikiLeaks has published from OPCW.

 

In one of the leaked e-mail exchanges, from February 27-28, between members of the fact finding mission (FFM) deployed to Douma and senior officials of the OPCW, the watchdog’s Chief of Cabinet Sebastien Braha ordered the removal of “all traces” of a report by Ian Henderson.

 

“Please get this document out of DRA [Documents Registry Archive]… And please remove all traces, if any, of its delivery/storage/whatever in DRA,” the email reads.

 

Henderson had inspected the sites in Douma and two cylinders that were found on the site of the alleged attack. In his report, he had concluded that the cylinders were more likely placed there — not dropped. His findings heavily indicated that the “attack” was staged.

 

US media and politicians uncritically claimed that the cylinders were dropped from the air by the Syrian government, killing civilians.

 

Since the cylinders appeared to be placed by hand, and the area was under the control of anti-government forces, Henderson’s findings lend credence to theories that the attack was staged to set up the Syrian president and prompt the US to attack.

 

WikiLeaks also released minutes from a meeting on June 6, 2018 where members of OPCW met with “three Toxicologists/Clinical pharmacologists, one bioanalytical and toxicological chemist” who all specialize in chemical weapons. The purposes of this meeting were “to solicit expert advice on the value of exhuming suspected victims of the alleged chemical attack in Douma on 7 April 2018” and “to elicit expert opinions from the forensic toxicologists regarding the observed and reported symptoms of the alleged victims.” They were particularly interested in “…whether the symptoms observed in victims were consistent with exposure to chlorine or other reactive chlorine gas.”

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/wikileaks-chemical-weapons-watchdog-ordered-deletion-of-all-traces-of-findings-that-syrian-chemical-attack-was-staged/

 

https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/#OPCW-DOUMA%20-%20Release%20Part%204

Anonymous ID: 887cf8 Dec. 27, 2019, 9:07 p.m. No.7639190   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7639129

Sadly, just as confused as you are at the moment, need to go through the wikileaks emails, I think for better clarity. I believe this is looking like a nice size kickback for silence might have occurred. As they say follow the money..but in this instance not sure who would have been the benefactor.

Anonymous ID: 887cf8 Dec. 27, 2019, 9:14 p.m. No.7639304   🗄️.is 🔗kun

FIGURES. Disgruntled Trump Voter Mark Graham in Democrat American Bridge Ads Lied — Did Not Even Vote in 2016

 

Democrats CAN’T EVEN FIND a Trump Voter in Pennsylvania who will not vote for him again in 2020! So they drag out some liar named Mark Graham WHO DID NOT EVEN VOTE in 2016. How predictable and pathetic!

 

Via Penn Live. An Erie County man who describes regret over voting for President Donald Trump in 2016 didn’t vote for him, according to news organizations that checked his voting record. Mark Graham is featured in videos created by America Bridge, a Democrat-supporting political action committee, or PAC. The ads are part of a $5 million advertising campaign being waged by American Bridge in the key swing states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.

 

Graham says in an ad, “I voted for Donald Trump in 2016 because I thought he would make a change.” Asked whether change has occurred, Graham replies “Not for the good.” Graham later states Trump “plays favorites for people like himself … He doesn’t understand life around here.”… …In a subsequent interview, Graham told Erie News Now he’s a registered Republican who participated in a focus group involving Republicans who supported Democrat Ron DiNicola in his unsuccessful 2018 run for U.S. Congress. Graham told the focus group re-electing Trump would be like “throwing gasoline on a fire.”

 

That led to The New York Times featuring Graham in two stories about dissatisfied Trump voters and swing voters, and apparently to him being contacted by American Bridge. The New York Times has attached corrections to both stories stating it confirmed Graham did not vote in the election. Graham has said his statements in the ad reflect his true feelings about Trump. The Republican Party of Pennsylvania has called for American Bridge to take down the ad and apologize.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/figures-disgruntled-trump-voter-mark-graham-in-democrat-american-bridge-ads-lied-did-not-even-vote-in-2016-video/