Re: Medical Professionals Speculating and Offering Opinions on the Medical Condition of Public Figures

I am sick of so-called professionals behaving unethically and being given a microphone by the so-called media to push an agenda. It is against American Medical Ethical guidelines to speculate on the medical condition of a public figure. So why aren't these unethical doctors taken to task for behaving unprofessionally? I think we all know why: Orange Man Bad Syndrome.

This bullshit needs to stop. These so-called doctors are violating ethical guidelines. If a lawyer or certified public accountant violates similar ethical guidelines he or she could lose his or her certification and ability to work in the field. So why is this Yale Ph.D., Dr Bandy Lee writing about "The dangerous case of Donald Trump" in Salon? The by-line says "Trump can no longer see reality". She is offering a medical opinion on a public figure which is a no-no according to the AMA. And she isn't being taken to task why? Orange Man Bad syndrome.

I'd love to hear the AMA comment on this one. Moving target anyone? Rules are rules…. EXCEPT…. if we don't like a public figure. Then whatever goes. Right?

"In fact, the American Psychiatric Association proscribes its members from commenting on the mental health of public figures under a nonbinding rule known as “the Goldwater Rule” [1], which originated after a 1964 magazine article that surveyed more than a thousand psychiatrists about Barry Goldwater’s emotional suitability for holding the office of president. (Goldwater later sued for libel and won a monetary settlement [2].) The fact that many mental health professionals routinely violate the Goldwater Rule does not invalidate it. Those of us in the health professions who are solicited for comments about public events would be wise to heed its rationale, regardless of our specialty [3]."

Direct Link: https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/speculating-public-figures-mental-health/2013-10

Archived Link: https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/speculating-public-figures-mental-health/2013-10

>>7642616

Sorry, mobile fagging. Links did not copy properly.

Salon article archive link:

> https://web.archive.org/web/20191228162157/https://www.salon.com/2019/06/14/yale-psychiatrist-bandy-lee-trumps-mental-health-is-now-a-national-and-global-emergency/

AMA ethical guidelines on commenting on the health of a public figure:

> https://web.archive.org/web/20191228162543/https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/speculating-public-figures-mental-health/2013-10

>>7642669

The marriage shill is back, which makes me smile. If you would like to do a deep dive on marriage, divorce, and putting away this video may interest you.

It is from the perspective of a messianic believer (believes in Jesus - Yeshua - and is also Torah observant… foods, feasts, etc.). If muh Bible is your foundation don't take what this shill cunt is saying about divorce as truth, dig into the Hebrew and Greek translations and context. I highly recommend listening to this video then doing the study on your own.

All this shill fuck is trying to do is discredit POTUS using sources relying on doctrines that do not line up with the word.

>>7642805

Sauce?