Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 28, 2019, 10:59 a.m. No.7644394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4618

>>7644318 (lb)

>they set up the demonstration

Ya know, I could totally agree that this was a demonstration. The proof of the concept happened during Tesla's lifetime.

The application was known to work…Tesla just never saw it on such a large scale.

Why make it "public"? - they know people have eyes everywhere looking at this type of data.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 28, 2019, 11:04 a.m. No.7644466   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4498

>>7643842 lb

>Does Crowdstrike possess 'gov_capablity' to trace 'break-in' route(s)?Does Crowdstrike possess 'gov_capability' re: foreign intercepts?

>>7643930 lb

>crowdstrike identified SR as 'leaker/hacker.'

>>7643996 lb

>BINGO

Coincidence?

 

Federal Election Commission records show that CrowdStrike, an FBI contractor and private cyber security firm, received a $98,849.84 check from the Democratic National Committee the day after slain DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered.

 

Less than a month after Rich was murdered, attorney Shawn Lucas, 38, was found dead in his bathroom on Aug. 2nd, 2016.

The next day, CrowdStrike received a check for $113,645.77 from the DNC.

 

Lucas delivered a lawsuit to DNC headquarters for a local court in early July 2016. The suit alleged the Democratic Party committed fraud by rigging their primary election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/fec-records-show-dnc-issued-checks-to-crowdstrike-day-after-murder-of-seth-rich-shawn-lucas/

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 28, 2019, 11:07 a.m. No.7644514   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Q

Thanks for All you do!

 

Was Vault 7 released for reasons such as to prevent crowdstrike from framing russia, and potentially starting a War?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 28, 2019, 11:13 a.m. No.7644588   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4650

Q

As the white knights that we are, are we able to save the Dems, Rino's, Hollywood, MSM from infiltration by adverse foreign groups/powers.

 

Can we get some public figures to cooperate and tell their story so we can save those blackmailed and threatened to engage in seditious acts?

 

It would be so great if Anons could ride into the sunset after all is said and done as the saviors of America.

 

We will be embraced and Loved if publically know we are saving the 'victims' engaged in of Foreign Overthrow of our Government.

 

It takes just one prominant figure to tell their tale.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 28, 2019, 11:27 a.m. No.7644729   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7644526

>While all of the federal offices of inspector generals operate separately from one another, they share information and some coordination through the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE)

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Inspector_General_(United_States)

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 28, 2019, 11:27 a.m. No.7644741   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4783 >>4870 >>5054 >>5113

>>7644426

https://defyccc.com/dnc-perkinscoie-retained-crowdstrike-on-may-3/

DNC / Perkins Coie hired Crowdstrike for perjury- October 2, 2019

 

Bombshell revelations about Crowdstrike, Perkins Coie (the DNC/DCCC law firm), and the DNC in a court filing made on September 29. Although most of it is redacted, the filing shows that:

 

1) Crowdstrike was hired by Perkins Coie, the law firm for the DNC, rather than by the DNC itself. Fusion GPS was hired in the same way and around the same time.

 

2) Perkins Coie hired Crowdstrike for the following:

CrowdStrike will work at Firm’s direction and will assist Firm [Perkins Coie] with providing legal advice to Firm Client [the DNC] by performing professional services related to cybersecurity (the “Services”).

 

That explains why Crowdstrike didn’t attempt to remediate the security breach. It was not hired to remediate anything. Crowdstrike was hired as an expert witness (or a false witness, or an expert forgery maker) for the DNC and the Hillary campaign against GOP and the Trump campaign.

 

3) DNC and Perkins Coie retained Crowdstrike on May 2-3 of 2016 — not on May 6, as it has been claimed by almost everybody over the last three years.

 

Now they claim attorney – client and/or attorney work product privileges.

https://www.scribd.com/document/427619989/DEMOCRATIC-NATIONAL-COMMITTEE-AND-DCCC-S-NOTICE-REGARDING-FILING-OF-SUPPLEMENTAL-EXHIBITS

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 28, 2019, 11:31 a.m. No.7644772   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7644690

I agree that you are on point.

If we position Anons as White Knights and 'Them' (conspirators) as the victims, the normies will naturally (over time) see us as what we are.

 

We are trying to save a Government, a System and Culture from Overthrow at the hands of infiltrating Foreign Groups and Powers. Instead of attacking, perhaps we should begin a P.R. meme, etc.campaign that 'we know you are held hostage, blackmailed, compromised, let us help!

 

If Q, etal. were able to get a prominant figure to publically admit they acted against their will because of threats (murkowski, e.g.) the job of taking back the Country would be met with support rather than resistance.

 

Q and NSA can handle the MSM, SM suppression and the narrative from the politicians, Hollywood (Taylor Swift), would then be from them to the world, not propoganda through them smearing the pursuit of justice.

 

Wag the Dog/Information Warfare.

Let's save poor Taylor Swift from extortion, theft, blackmail. We publically save her, we won the battle, then others come forth and we win the war during the 'Purge'.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 28, 2019, 11:37 a.m. No.7644823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4870 >>4874 >>5054

>>7644783

https://libertyunyielding.com/2017/03/11/witnesses-houses-russia-election-hearings-will-100-biased/

 

And still there’s more. Through their common roots in McAfee, Alperovitch and Kurtz have an extensive history with top cyber expert Phyllis Schneck, who appears in the Esquire piece from October. In fact, Alperovitch and Schneck were at Georgia Tech together (see the Esquire article), and later were vice presidents of McAfee at the same time Kurtz was McAfee’s chief technology officer (CTO). Alperovitch has obviously had a close professional relationship with Schneck; their names are both on four separate patent applications.

 

What is Schneck doing today? Since 2013, she’s been the Deputy Under Secretary for Cybersecurity and Communications for the National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD) – i.e., the chief cybersecurity official for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Which department interestingly spent 2016 looking for reasons to federalize the supervision of state election systems. And, what do you know, conveniently found just such a reason in the CrowdStrike narrative that the Russians were behind the hacking of the DNC servers.

 

Schneck also served for eight years as the chairman of the national board of the FBI’s InfraGard program, a public-private partnership with the commercial security industry. Not a bad contact to have teed up in your smartphone, as the execs at CrowdStrike quite probably do.

 

An…interesting CIA connection

CrowdStrike itself doesn’t appear to have links with the CIA. But FireEye, a company whose work going back to 2013 attributes the two key “threat groups” implicated in the DNC hack to Russia, does have a link to the CIA. FireEye’s subsidiary Mandiant identified the two threat groups fingered in the CrowdStrike analysis as “APT28” and “APT29,” and connected them with Russia – work that figures large in the CrowdStrike assessment.

 

And In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital firm, has been invested in FireEye since 2009.

FireEye’s Mandiant is one of two companies the Washington Post (link above) cited as “independent” firms “seconding” CrowdStrike’s assessment about Russia.