As I spoke with family members this past week about the political happening of the past few weeks, 2 things became very evident. 1) people are still incredibly confused/misinformed/unaware of what is happening that they themselves were saying more and more “I know very little” or “I need to learn more about what is happening”. This is interesting because before, everyone seemed so much more certain of what was going on with Trump and the culture wars. Their failing confidence I think is a direct result of [them] losing control of the narrative. 2) I am sorely lacking in the ability to summarize certain events or happenings that would red pill anyone if articulated appropriately and without getting into to much of the detail. Ukraine is a prime example. I can go off about chalupa or Kolomoisky but these things are so separated from from the narratives that the normies are working with/are used to that it just confuses them and ultimately they just default on “IDK, orange man bad”.

These 2 observations gave me an idea. Other than creating dank memes, we need the equivalent of elevator red pill talks. These talks are short enough for normies to follow, simple enough for normies to understand given the MSM narratives that infest their perception, and effective enough to at least make the normie pause and think about the topic from a new perspective. In essence, it needs to break to hypnosis of the MSM and plant the seed of truth in under 10 minutes.

I believe anons (especially oldfags…looking for yalls help the most here) have enough ammo on topics to briefly summarize in such a way as to fit the criteria above. I also believe that with the impeachment and the IG report things are beginning to look weird/off enough to normies for this to be an effective means by which to red pill people.

It’s time to go beyond memes. They are great and all but this war will need to be won with more than just imagines. It will need to be won with words and interactions that drive people’s curiosity enough so that they start to question the mainstream narratives and do research for themselves.

What do anons think? Is a new thread creation worth such endeavor?

>>7644707

Do you think there is enough verifiable information to do a few of these talks? They don’t have to be so detailed as to run into the wall of unverifiable information. I agree with your point though. It’s hard to retain credibility

>>7644752

Perhaps these could do just that, make them think they discovered or caught on to something by their own merit. By favorite example is telling people to google “save the littles” video. Blows them away what the kids say it was people related to a govt entity.

>>7644796

Who are they?