en fuego! tyb
Musk says Boring Co's Las Vegas tunnel to 'hopefully' be operational next year
Elon Musk, founder of tunneling enterprise Boring Company, said in a tweet that a commercial tunnel in Las Vegas would “hopefully” be fully operational in 2020.
"Boring Co is completing its first commercial tunnel in Vegas, going from Convention Center to Strip, then will work on other projects," Musk tweeted here late on Friday, in reply to a user's question about the company's tunnels. Musk, who also leads electric-car maker Tesla Inc and rocket company SpaceX, has been seeking to revolutionize transportation by sending passengers packed into pods through an intercity system of giant, underground vacuum tubes known as a hyperloop.
The company has completed its project Test Tunnel, located in Hawthorne, California, and other ongoing projects include the Chicago Express Loop and the East Coast Loop from Washington D.C. to Baltimore.
In April the U.S. Transportation Department issued a draft environmental assessment for a Washington, D.C.- Baltimore tunnel, the first step in a governmental review of the project from Boring Co. In July, Boring Co raised about $117 million in a round of funding from 20 unnamed investors after offering to sell about $120 million in equity.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boring-co-tunnel/musk-says-boring-cos-las-vegas-tunnel-to-hopefully-be-operational-next-year-idUSKBN1YW0AN
Did Guccifer 2.0 Fake “Russian Fingerprints?''
he veracity of alleged “Russian hacking fingerprints” reported by cyber firm Crowdstrike on the DNC’s servers have been facing renewed scrutiny in recent weeks. If it can be proven that evidence of “Russian Hacking” had been simulated by the creators of Guccifer 2.0, then the essential fabric of the ‘Russian Hacking’ narrative would unravel. The creation of Guccifer 2.0, and the intent behind its creation, may have a profound effect on establishing the real source of the DNC leaks.
The website G2-Space by Adam Carter has become a repository for documents relating to Guccifer 2.0, who asserts that the alleged hacker was an artificial creation intended to associate Russian involvement with the DNC leaks. This week Carter reported to Disobedient Media that he was contacted by an individual he believes worked as a military intelligence agent during the Obama administration, which added weight to the questions raised by the content of his site.
Disobedient Media previously reported that to date, Crowdstrike is the only entity which has been allowed access to the DNC servers. Crowdstrike concluded the DNC servers had been hacked and identified evidence of “Russian hacking” had occurred. Disobedient Media has noted that Crowdstrike is linked to billionaire George Soros through the Atlantic Council. Politico also reported that George Soros gave $8 million in funding to Hillary Clinton’s campaign through various super-pacs. After Clinton lost the 2016 Presidential election The Wall Street Journal reported Soros had lost almost $1 billion due to a stock rally. That Soros would fund Clinton’s campaign with simultaneous ties to Crowdstrike raises serious questions regarding their objectivity.
Speculation about Crowdstrike’s objectivity increased after former FBI Director Comey testified that the DNC had not allowed the FBI access to their servers. The Daily Mail wrote that U.S. intelligence agencies have relied on CrowdStrike’s work with no other known forensic evidence publicly disclosed to link Russia to the attacks. Many questioned the reliability of the single firm providing verification of Russian hacking to U.S. intelligence agencies.
Crowdstrike was also forced to retract some of their claims recently regarding evidence of Russian hacking. On March 23rd, 2017, Voice of America (VOA) ran a damning piece citing British think tank the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), who stated that CrowdStrike erroneously used IISS data as proof of the intrusion. Furthermore, the IISS disavowed any connection to the CrowdStrike report. The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense also claimed that the combat losses and hacking never happened, meaning that Crowdstrike had apparently fabricated facts and details in the report completely. Crowdstrike was humiliatingly forced to retract portions of the report after speaking with an IISS research associate for defense and military analysis. This back-paddling fueled concerns regarding Crowdstrike’s credibility.
Guccifer 2.0 had claimed responsibility for the first of the leaks on June 15th last year. Disobedient Media previously reported on Guccifer 2.0’s private messages with actress Robyn Young. The private messages demonstrated a stark contradiction with Guccifer2.0’s initial claims that they had hacked the DNC, as they referred to Seth Rich as their ‘source.’ Our previous coverage of this conversation supported the conclusion that Rich may have been the original leaker of the DNC emails to Wikileaks, but most likely had nothing to do with Guccifer2.0 or Russian Hacking.
Seth Rich had been a DNC data analyst and staffer before he was killed in July last year. That August, Fox News reported Wikileaks founder Julian Assange strongly implied Seth Rich was the source for the DNC leaks. The Washington Post also noted that Wikileaks also offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to a conviction in Seth Rich’s murder. Assange’s statements and Wikileaks’s reward have been interpreted by many to be an indication that Rich was the original source of the DNC emails.
Crowdstrike‘s report on the DNC hack had also used the term “Fancy Bear” and “Cozy Bear.” Meanwhile, The Washington Post described Seth Rich as ‘the guy who showed up in panda suits.’ Social media attributed to Rich was also found which often referenced pandas. Speculation has grown that Crowdstrike’s use of terminology in using bears to describe the “Russian hacking” malware. Such speculation was inflamed when Andrew Therriault tagged Rich’s alleged twitter handle in an apparently mocking tweet referencing pandas.
rest at link
https://disobedientmedia.com/2017/06/did-guccifer-2-0-fake-russian-fingerprints/
from June 2017
look up who guccifer is.
not many are according to official numbers
Just under 10% Short Volume Ratio
https://fintel.io/ss/us/crwd
and not an endorsement for doing so either.
i member. have it somewhere i'm sure. when you get to over 16k it's hard to keep track even naming things old skool style.
from June 2019
DOJ Admits FBI Never Saw Crowdstrike Report on DNC Russian Hacking Claim…
The foundation for the Russian election interference narrative is built on the claim of Russians hacking the servers of the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and subsequently releasing damaging emails that showed the DNC worked to help Hillary Clinton and eliminate Bernie Sanders.
Despite the Russian ‘hacking’ claim the DOJ previously admitted the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server. Instead the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike.
rest at link
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/15/doj-admits-fbi-never-saw-crowdstrike-report-on-dnc-russian-hacking-claim/comment-page-4/
fuck off freddy
Common Funding Themes Link ‘Whistleblower’ Complaint and CrowdStrike Firm Certifying DNC Russia ‘Hack’
excerpt
In a perhaps unexpected development, another Atlantic Council funder is Burisma, the natural gas company at the center of allegations regarding Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. Those allegations were the subject of Trump’s inquiry with Zelemsky related to Biden. The Biden allegations concern significant questions about Biden’s role in Ukraine policy under the Obama administration. This took place during a period when Hunter Biden received $50,000 a month from Burisma.
rest at link
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/28/common-funding-themes-link-whistleblower-complaint-and-crowdstrike-firm-certifying-dnc-russia-hack/