Question: can we get further comment on this passage?

"

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. "

What you refer to are typical talking points of post-Enlightenment era political philosophy.

The belief in reason and rejection of revelation is what socialism brought, to put it simply. Can you elaborate?

[THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Q]

>>7647444

I've expressed myself quite clumsily.

The point is that those talking points correspond to the general trend of RATIONALISM in western thought. This trend led, on one hand, to the US, but on another leads to socialism, ATHEISM, dystopian hypertrophy of corrupt state institutions under cover of shady "scientific authority", etc.

The succeeding juxtaposition of the "CAPD" part seems to be ambiguous, and suggest opposite alternative meanings.

Is this so? Is this relevant?

>>7647516

How does this bear on the question I asked?