the nonsequeter false proverbs that morph into platitudes of obviously false conclusion that imply some kind of simplicity or stupidity that doesn't really exist often are just what the portfolio of posts provide, of shills.

the ideas are intentionally paradoxical and designed only to be confusing.

as if there is some deep truth in it, but it's a puddle of nothing.

the writer doesn't want to provide anything, merely posts nonsense to waste your time.

if you want such stuff pick up a book of poetry. and even in that you'll find better writing.

the form of it is never more than just a few short phrases.

they provide nothing, not even poetry, within their conundrum of mind-mush.

at 69 posts the marriage scold is still at it.

what about the sin of obsessive shaming?

So how are the environmental scolds dealing with New Years? Should no one celebrate because it's a 'high foot print' event?

Happy New Year 2Q2Q!

>>7652497

is this your first day here?

>>7652534

you don't have to be unfriendly about it.

everyone who is real here gets called a shill.

welcome to the club, anon.

the following might be classified as a "'what is a slide' slide"

>>7652569

it might be a cool theory. Or whatever.

the slide is 'discussing it here'

not that it's not a cool theory.

the slide is talking about it here.

there are other ones, very compelling, that always eat up a lot of attention.

so, sure, discuss it.

set up a bread.

look for it.

but anyone here who needs to know what it is, or thinks it might be something, is going to do that on their own.

a slide doesn't mean that the information isn't compelling and interesting, but that it distracts and takes away attention from what is really needed to be focused upon, but who says what that is.