Anonymous ID: cddab9 Dec. 29, 2019, 10:21 a.m. No.7654277   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4288 >>4291 >>4295

LATE Q:

>>7654139 —————————— If Russia didn't [hack] the DNC (insider breach)…..

 

Also, was 8kun just under attack? I couldn't reach the site for a good 10 minutes or so, working now though.

THANKS BAKER!

Anonymous ID: cddab9 Dec. 29, 2019, 10:25 a.m. No.7654329   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4354

Reminder of the findings of the Forensicator:

>Due to the estimated speed of transfer (23 MB/s) calculated in this study, it is unlikely that this initial data transfer could have been done remotely over the Internet.

>The initial copying activity was likely done from a computer system that had direct access to the data. By “direct access” we mean that the individual who was collecting the data either had physical access to the computer where the data was stored, or the data was copied over a local high speed network (LAN).

https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/

 

HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH

Anonymous ID: cddab9 Dec. 29, 2019, 10:29 a.m. No.7654384   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4426

>>7654354

Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year. Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:

 

There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

 

HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH!

Anonymous ID: cddab9 Dec. 29, 2019, 10:31 a.m. No.7654406   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The timing of Q bringing back up the forensicator, DNC LEAK, and Seth Rich is very interesting; as Trump talks about Crowd Strike and the server too.

Anonymous ID: cddab9 Dec. 29, 2019, 10:36 a.m. No.7654469   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4519 >>4542

Anyone else an independent?

I just think the Republican party has way too many neocon uniparty members and act as a conservative to keep power. I can't support the party as a whole, so I vote for individual Republicans. It's clearly not as bad as the Democrat party, but it's not something I can support.

Anonymous ID: cddab9 Dec. 29, 2019, 10:42 a.m. No.7654539   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7654519

Oh same, I completely and 110% support POTUS. I think he would win as an independent too, but the infrastructure and funding from the party is useful.

Trump and the American people have actually redpilled a lot of them, they're doing a lot better.