>>7656571 (lb)

I disagree that this is exclusively a D trick. All politicians throw shade to block out the light. The initial Q post which drew the fire suggested Rs were not represented in the overall election (3768-3771). When the anons started shining light to find that the letter was simply for 3 parties which permit votes from non-party affiliates did Q add post 3772 to imply the meaning of the posts were misconstrued and that confusion on the part of Rs would ensue due to this document.

I have watched pols closely for years - this set of posts disturb me to the core - they appear to have come from a political operative, not MI. The last post, 3774 I find the most disturbing. These statements:

[Mueller][impeachment] all meant to 'slowdelayprevent' the exposure [& prosecution] of their crimes.

Will new articles of impeachment be 'continually' drafted in effort to hold as ammunition to prevent Senate hearings re: [D] party corruption?

indicate to me that we "do not have it all" because "they" have continued to be successful at their delaying tactics.

If you have evidence of a crime, do you not proceed to trial to convict? If we are awaiting "them" to initiate a trial and "they" are well aware that we need them to do the initiation, then why on Earth would they initiate it? It tells me that the white hats do not have it all, because they do not have the leverage to bring charges and begin the trial phase. Their evidence is insufficient (admissibility) to begin this action, so we'll have to wait a little longer.

REALLY??!!

BULLSHIT!!!!

This whole thing is starting to smell really bad!