Anonymous ID: f325f1 Dec. 29, 2019, 4:18 p.m. No.7657375   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7438

>>7657333 ← Trips confirm, Baker

 

Would you like to update the Meme Ammo dough?

We could delete June & July, and make room for Space Force folder.

A January folder will be coming soon.

 

~~2019-Jul mega.nz/#F!EQoHkI5J!yVj-1kiuPbq6Jh8cn9q5dQ~~

~~2019-Jun mega.nz/#F!VMwFkIAb!_A2FXapKstvBEfntYRlo1g~~

 

Space Force mega.nz/#F!YRog1CzA!zJWOQG2MtJppmTa3yaJXvQ

 

As always, thanks and gratitude for bakers' service.

Anonymous ID: f325f1 Dec. 29, 2019, 4:22 p.m. No.7657417   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7657373

This ever-doomer "Economic Collapse" does not fit with the narrative that POTUS needs the American people to understand.

Throw away the fear porn.

Read POTUS tweets.

Dig, meme, pray.

Amplify President Trump's messages about the economy. America is Winning. Choose Greatness.

Don't amplify the message of a fear porn artist.

Anonymous ID: f325f1 Dec. 29, 2019, 4:36 p.m. No.7657550   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7613 >>7706

>>7657481

TY. There's a collection just made today.

Have them all. They may come in handy to clarify certain things. Like anything else, they seem to get refined and honed over the course of a set.

Anonymous ID: f325f1 Dec. 29, 2019, 4:39 p.m. No.7657587   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7617

>>7657501

When perusing a bunch of news feeds, anon picks articles based on content, not source. If I post something from OAN does that mean 15 anons are going to jump on me and call me a shill? That would be prejudice of a different kind.

 

Reposting from earlier today:

 

Let's Talk about Paytriots

 

I'm in favor of useful information, wherever it comes from.

 

Anons are smart enough to filter out the personal agendas and personalities and home in on the information and evaluation the information's worth – independent of who the messenger is.

We don't follow the stars and we understand there are paytriots; which implies use with caution, use discernment, don't automatically rule out anybody or anything. Neither do we believe anything at face value without evaluating and comparing with other info sources. The credibility of the messenger matters of course, but so does the information itself.

 

An ad hominem attack against a specific information source often turns out to be a clue, that somebody strongly wants to PROHIBIT that individual's information from anons' consideration.

 

The more they shill, the deeper we drill.