Backchannel
Q has been bringing this up recently–not only in terms of this board being a
sort of "backchannel" to reaching the public conscious, but in a way he hinted
was somewhat related to the Cuban Missile Crisis and "The Sum of All Fears."
Around the time of that false flag in Syria (post 1079), it sounded as if he
was specifying communication through a White House back channel:
"Relay back channel S-WH-E-P1"
"The Sum of All Fears" features the protagonist speaking directly to the
Russians via the "Moscow-Washington Hotline" in order to avert nuclear war.
This communication method was brought about as a result of the Cuban Missile
Crisis:
https://www.electrospaces.net/2012/10/the-washington-moscow-hot-line.html
I'm pretty sure this is the "backchannel" Q is referring to.
Around December 10th, Pompeo met with the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey
Lavrov. If you look at the transcript of the press conference, Lavrov mentions
this "back channel" twice. The first time, in regards to the bullshit claims of
Russian interference in the 2016 election:
>I'd like to remind you that when the first statements on this topic began, that was on the eve of the presidential election in 2016. We used the channels that existed back then between Moscow and Washington, together with Barack Obama. We have asked many times our American partners about the opportunity to deal with these suspicions that were expressed in October 2016, all the way up to President Trump's inauguration.
>We suggested to our colleagues that in order to dispel all suspicions that are baseless, let us publish this closed-channel correspondence starting from October 2016 till November 2017 so it would all become very clear to many people. However, regrettably, this administration refused to do so. But I'd like to repeat once again we are prepared to do that, and to publish the correspondence that took place through that channel would clear many matters up, I believe
Then later, after being asked about the Mueller report:
>Now, as for meddling or non-meddling, you suggested to simply read the Mueller report. We read it. There is no proof of any collusion, and our suggestion to publish – I’d like to repeat it for the fourth time now – to publish that data that would show how Russia responded through special channel – this is a specially designated channel to review threats in cyber networks – to show how Russia responded, how Russia suggested to discuss this confidentially through this channel, how all these proposals were rejected by Obama’s administration.
https://www.state.gov/secretary-michael-r-pompeo-and-russian-foreign-minister-sergey-lavrov-at-a-press-availability/
Looking at that last quote, and compare it to this line from the
"Moscow-Washington Hotline" wiki:
>In 2012, it was announced that a proposal was being negotiated with Moscow to add cyber warfare to the topics to be discussed on the hotline.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow%E2%80%93Washington_hotline
So I'm pretty sure that this is one of the back channels that Q has been
alluding to…and I'm sure that the data Russia has provided from that time
frame will feature prominently in Durham's investigations.