Anonymous ID: 12d903 Dec. 30, 2019, 3:10 a.m. No.7661158   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1160 >>1186 >>1191 >>1196 >>1450 >>1796

It's the last day in 2019. Don't read this post if you don't like spoilers.

 

dotdotdot

 

Q started as "Q clearance patriot". There are exactly TWO ways the public, with unclassified access, can take that statement. One is Department of Energy, high level access. The other is the NSA's Q directorate for counter-intelligence. Both things have "Q clearance". Two options.

 

Which one do you anons think, after every post, applies to the given set of data?

 

So house.gov:

 

https://hurd.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/shadow-brokers-investigation-focusing-former-nsa-insider

 

Read the data. What has Q said about Snowden? What does the article say about hunting Snowden? What is the answer based on data to the above question?

Anonymous ID: 12d903 Dec. 30, 2019, 3:29 a.m. No.7661201   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1203 >>1218 >>1234 >>1450

You guys are like the mainstream media.

 

HEY DUDES. Q refers to NSA Q directorate who is hunting Snowden and policing every other intelligence agency. Which agency was the person who warned Trump in charge of? Was it NSA?

 

2020 = NSA counter-intelligence is a major source for these drops.

 

Anyone? media blackout?

 

Instead of asking POTUS about Q DOTDODOT. Ask POTUS about NSA Q directorate.

 

Or not. Whatever.

Anonymous ID: 12d903 Dec. 30, 2019, 3:48 a.m. No.7661255   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1267 >>1301 >>1344 >>1450

>>7661234

 

Our oath is to the constitution. If Snowden exposed violations of the constitution then that is is positive for the Republic even if he did it for compromised reasons. Traitor? Every person who dumped tea off a ship was a traitor to the monarchy. Things are more nuanced than that simplicity. If Snowden was manipulated to do the right thing for the wrong people, he still did the right thing, but perhaps at the expense of the greater good. It's not dark and light.

Anonymous ID: 12d903 Dec. 30, 2019, 4:02 a.m. No.7661309   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1450

>>7661267

 

Philo Sophiaโ€ฆ The Love of Wisdom. Is something Plato wrote about in his Republic. A Republic can only be tempered by a Philospher King. This isn't a monarchyโ€ฆ but a trained body who influences by altruism, not immediate gain. Philosphers (and I do NOT mean modern western philosophy) do not rule our politicians and military generals.

 

Philosophers, in the true sense of the love of wisdom, will one day, not rule, but inform those leaders and generals.

Anonymous ID: 12d903 Dec. 30, 2019, 4:16 a.m. No.7661343   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1353 >>1450

Anons of our Republic.

 

Remember. Listen to the cadence. Remember we wen in for why? 17 9/11 bombers were Saudi. Iraq did not have WMDs.

 

We people of the Republic must fucking PROTECT our boys. We may not send them in harms way unless the cause is truly just.

Anonymous ID: 12d903 Dec. 30, 2019, 5:27 a.m. No.7661605   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1623 >>1636

>>7661567

 

OK yea. Swordy is dope in itself. BUT. BUT. What if the aim of saying something positive is to trigger a massive cascade of responses?

 

Swordy's message is on point and dope. No doubt. BUT. How many slide off that post?

 

What I am saying is this: if swordy WASN'T a slide tactic. The message would change slightly every day instead of being a bot repeat post. OR swordy might be some dumb autist who wakes up everyday at exactly the same time for the last two years and does the exact same thing at the exact same time.

 

Which version works for your mind?

Anonymous ID: 12d903 Dec. 30, 2019, 5:37 a.m. No.7661640   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1711

>>7661623

 

Faith and discipline are both forms of neural programming.

 

If you want to believe that swordy is a real person, who wakes up every day, and does the thing. I call that faith. I'm not against it. But I don't believe swordy is 1 person.

 

We can both agree the message is positive, and I prefer positive shilling to negative shilling personally.