So, are you saying that the idea of someone being blacklisted from important stuff, like a livelyhood is a pervasive thing now?
Like, if an individual suspects that they are on a list because they cannot get work no matter what they do, that they might be correct in thinking they've been targetted?
10 years ago that individual would be called a conspiracy nut… But knowing what we know now… Eep.
>The content you censor yourself from is of no purpose except to attempt to convince others to censor themselves from content you disagree with.
Thanks for stating this BV. Shadilay!
>complain complain complain
Welcome to freedom of speech. It is what it is, warts and all.
If you're real, then Shadilay!
If you're a clown, then go suck your mom's cock, whiner.
This anon gets it.
Prodding the clowns is only useful for analysis. It is not a good idea to feed them targets on the reg, unless you like being attacked by their bots.
Feeding them (you)s hands them a literal programmatic target. The bots can't work properly as a defense for them if they have no target (ie- the linkback the (you) provides them)
It works by showing humans what the opinions of the clowns are, while forcing the clowns to work for whatever tactic they are failing at, because their bots have no target.
ie- it forces the clowns to engage in a way that's not on their terms.
>Do you really have more faith in every anon here, including the increasing amount that are joining us now, than a moderation policy that Idk, keeps the board dedicated to qresearch?
I've got complete faith in actual anons. I have no faith in shills or concernfags, at all. They can go neck themselves.. The BO has made it very plain as to why the training wheels are off.
I have nothing further to say to you on this topic.