Anonymous ID: c5ceef March 23, 2018, 8:33 a.m. No.766368   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>766345

Yeah, ((they)) always need a scapegoat. ((They)) never seem to take any accountability for ((their)) actions. Easier to get someone else to do the dirty work and take the blame. Sadly, it seems there are many willing to do so for $$$$.

Anonymous ID: c5ceef March 23, 2018, 8:50 a.m. No.766494   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6618 >>6707

>>766424

>are insulated by our (meaning WW Pop) deep historical adulation of (( ))?

 

True. Even easier to do so as ((they)) have always written the history books. I've come to the conclusion that our lack of knowledge about what truly happened in the past has played a very significant part in the sad state of affairs of our present situation. It seems most people really do believe that fact is fiction and fiction is fact. It's all terribly upside down.

Anonymous ID: c5ceef March 23, 2018, 9:17 a.m. No.766743   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6880

>>766618

Sure, I can give you the brief summary of what I've found thus far.

 

Ste-Claire (French line of the Clan Sinclair) was divided somewhere around the time the Templars fell into trouble with King Philip IV. It seems some of the family left for Scotland and joined Robert the Bruce in defending the land against the English crown, King Edward II. Then things get confusing as their are "myths" that Henry Sinclair II set sail to America. I think this story is more than "myth", btw. It seems he left as the family was divided with some wanting to pledge to God, others to the new Scottish crown which was becoming more entrenched in "Family" ways. I'm still not clear on exactly how the Orders tie in but they keep popping up in the research and I'd like to better understand the role they play if you have any suggestionsโ€ฆ.