everyone could try this URL to send twitter a message:
https://twitter.com/login/error?censorship_IS_SEDITION
which of the 'they' have taken over the who?
no sure if it makes sense, but it is a 'thing':
if you want something too much the playful people who are doing things for you, who need to perform a service for you, often, when they think you are being a manipulator, often will deny you the request, even if the request is then granted to the next one in line.
I think it's the 'anon is a little bitch' syndrome.
It's in the same class of syndrome as the straindsand syndrome.
see:
so if you aren't friends with the guy at the restaurant you never order any of his meals?
the bakers aren't here to be your 'fren', in fact a good baker doesn't let themselves get personal with the touch feely anon who beg them for notables.
The baker is a big swinging dick of an anon who has important shit going on, while you whine on about 'oh my most important notable'.
notables were a concession to the whiney bitch syndrome anon.
you get underfoot in a working kitchen you but get boiling water spilled accedentally and some it might get on you, cause you put yourself in the way.
who cares about frigging notables.
if you have something real it will not go unnoticed.
that time it was only you and the other anon
who clued you in and told you
why you so . . .
and opened your eyes to it all
but you don't share the moment,
or give a cap
because being there
can only happen once.
what there? oh, what there, cryptic anon?
when you understand that even though you think you know what or who, you never really do.
that time that . . . .said 'its me what do you want' and all you could blurt out was an 'I think your awesome I was trolling someone else . . . but you're really here '
any anon who go on about BO and Baker and all that are participating in a rouse and ought to know better.
what you speak is what you get.
when you call 'suchandso to you' you
call it to yourself, ackktually
this is a gaslighting troll who intentionally says what I didn't say to try and drive me off so he can ? ? ?
not sure don't care.
basic point: he says what I didn't say as if I said it, like Adam Schiff would do.
adam is that you?
gaslight much?
your obvioulsy a frustrated gay man who is still all about 'hooking up' but know it's wrong to do it with strangers, or at all anymore, now that you've grown up but . . . you still wish you did and would . . . if I showed up at your door step you'd be throwing yourself at my feat like the guy in the picture and I don't even look a little bit like Clint, though he is one of my favs.
you might review all my posts in this bread and learn a thing or two.
did you expose your thinking?
seriously the gaslighting in here is overwhelming.
even I trying to say 'stop with the stupidity of this BO Baker shame talking , and just deal with the here and now, I'm confronted with accusations of being . . . aa 'democrat'
how much more insulting could you possibly be?
but don't worry, I'm tough. I can take it.
but but but
the anon said I was a
democrat . . .
what have I done wrong to give that impression?
you are what you say you are, I am mee and I don't perscripe to your debauchery.
basic point it's funny howyou say 'we train ed the bot to blah blah balh and blah blah blah'
so what? someone trained you to think of yourself as what you said, and put others in lumping it wiht that and it's not true.
you speak only for yourself.
ok and 'what you say is what you get' so you've trained yourself to say what you do not mean and you get what you do not want. That is the essenece of creepiness.
you've allowed yourself to be that which you hate through an operational conditioning of false opposites.
you are hopeless and broken.
or you could say what you are and that voids what I say. But listen to what you say you are?
I am not that.
I doubt you are either.
say what you mean and stop with the opposites day nonsense.
you are free, anon, and yet you wear the chains of bigotry of language and ideas, as if what you say, even though false and grotesque, were true, when it is not.
Free, free at last.
but I think with a bird like you if I open your cage door you'll loop back around and bird-dew on my head.
I'll collect your guawanna and feed it to a plant. And then if I ever encounter you again I'll let you eat that plant. All of this is of course in allegory.
the plant is 'awareness' eat it now.
now our encounter is over.
but but but
since you always say what you don't reaslly mean, how do I decode this?
this is not in your language of false operationally opposite ideas of falacy?
you en word using loser, you aren't passing down anything but stupidity of word usage.
"anything can be blamed on whatever we say it is"
and they they try and take away your stuff, or censor you.
what you speak is what you get
I understand you, I doubt you understand me.
or is it the other way around or both, but only in different aspects.
I'd not let you use that language so I'd hear it outloud. you should consider that you had done to you what you think you do to other people. Subliminal that is deception is a kind of evil practice.
another example of a nonsequetor gang stacking of talents ethnic obcessives.
fellas, you lost.
get a new career.