Anonymous ID: 62bbc5 Dec. 30, 2019, 7:03 a.m. No.7662179   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2442 >>2503

Mentioned this right in the heel of #9801:

>>7654307 (Brd #9794)

anon lays out interesting connections. Worth a read to lubricate the almonds.

>1aac85

>Anons,

>Logically

>What bridges the gap between

>"DNC BREACH/DOSSIER

>DNC

>SR>

>WL>

>and

>Hussein

>DNI DIR (Clapper)

>Clown Dir (Brennan)

>If we're on SR and WL right now, Hussein is next up.

>Who gave the order to ice SR?

>How would Clapper and Brennan be involved?

>Once the order was given,

>Goog,

>Crowdstrike,

>DNC

>facilitated the

>Murder of SR by 2 MS13 thugs.

>With Debbie Noodles doing ground game with assistance from Fibbies and D_J.

>Read that over and think about it's implications.

>read it again.

>Now ask yourself WHY would this entire group of slime do such a thing to SR?

>What is so important about the leak from SR to WL that caused POTUS, Clapper, Brennan, DNC, Goog and more to conspire against pandaman?

>INCOMING INSURANCE FILE RELEASE.

>And the revelation of the higher network of control from

>Sauds,

>Roths

>and Ballsack-eyes.

>What does it take to tip over this first domino? Declass 1-12.

 

>>7654396 (PB)

>Curveball time.

>If [SR]>[WL] does that ">" imply SR sent info to WL?

>

>Then why is [WL]>Hussein?

>Is there a connection we're missing between WL and Hussein?

>

>Did WL comms with Bummer? Directly? Backchannel?

>

>We all believe WL was white hat, or at least chaotic neutral.

>What if their Bummer/Saud/Clown? [they're sic]

>comms between WL and Bummer who then kicked down orders to Clapper then to Brennan,

>then to Clas:1-12 (DECLAS brings down the house? 1-12 house members in the know?)

>who then enlisted Goog

>who then enlisted CS,

>who then interfaced with DNC

>who then triggered SR Murder?

>Curveball, WL was a honeypot and fed info back to Sauds who controlled Michael's-Bummer?

Anonymous ID: 62bbc5 Dec. 30, 2019, 7:09 a.m. No.7662214   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7662151

This already in notables after much bitching and whining, along with the 666 ft elevation of White Settlement, and couple other conjunctions that don't prove anything, but worth noting as correlations in case of numerology type fuckery. That is all. Not falling into this Christchurn=Church of Christ without comms or real proof. No different than helicopter dropping shit onto Parkland and Parkland, and Parkland conjunctions. Note it as possible fuckery and that's that.

Why posting again anon?

Anonymous ID: 62bbc5 Dec. 30, 2019, 7:53 a.m. No.7662457   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7661982

any earlier anon analysis of the first part of the vid?

Where there is a flash (first shot), but no sound, no reaction from person in front, only later does everyone react w/ loud sounds? Weird.

Noticing media cuts as well, taking first flash (no sound) then later take-down. Odd.

Anonymous ID: 62bbc5 Dec. 30, 2019, 7:57 a.m. No.7662481   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7662442

yes, reading same way, a BRIDGE.

Same bread mentioned, responding to that anon:

>What bridges the gap

There are over 20 Q posts with the word "bridge" in it. Here is a bit from one of them, Q 1516:

THE BRIDGE: PODESTA GROUP

Bridge between media, FBI/DOJ, HRC+

Why did the Podesta Group close?

JP / Huma NOV.

When did Huber start?

November?

HRC panic / deal req DEC (think Huber).

Coincidence?

Anonymous ID: 62bbc5 Dec. 30, 2019, 8:01 a.m. No.7662503   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7662179

Other posts by same anon:

>How does JA connect to Hussein?

and re >>7662442

> if the ">" implies info or comms,

>would you expect JA to be in contact with Hussein?

>How? Why would he be able to? What relationship exists?

>Magnitsky act?

>I'm speculating that this image q posted implies WL had contact with Hussein.

>If WL white and Hussein black, I don't really see that being possible,

>f WL black and Hussein black…that puts a whole new perspective to WL, JA, and the Insurance files.

and

>You know what that means if WL is blackhat working with Hussein?

>Rich was honeypotted.

>And the release of the keys 10/2016 was genuine, contained by Wizards and Warlocks.

>That means the push to BTC was blackhat,

>and WL's involvement early on in BTC…

>…BTC a blackhat laundering vehicle?

>We've had mixed messages, many authority-anons saying it's a trafficking payment scheme.

>Others touting it's immutability.

>Just riffing here.