>>7664484 pb

>re: Cali possibly losing a seat, Montana gaining one

Has the citizenship thing with the census been resolved yet?

It's probably the most important thing on the horizon, or at least in the top 5.

Voter fraud is real, but it's not an issue that can be dealt with head on right now without a lot of investigation, evidence, court cases etc.

Overrepresentation due to fraudulently inflated population number that count illegals/wetbacks IS something that can be dealt with head on and out in the open.

How many EXTRA seats do states like California hold in the house that they HAVE NO RIGHT TO due to counting illegals as population for representation? I'd wager it's a lot.

This shit also fucks the balance of power internally in state level politics with the legislature. How many legislators does say, King County in WA state have in the state house that they are simply not entitled to? Has to be even more blatant in California.

Anyone on the same page here, or have some insight?

>>7665955

Homan brought the issue up on Hilton's show sunday but the convo went in other directions.

This is something substantive that should be getting pushed.

>>7665955

The citizenship question on the census is more of a priority than voterid for the reasons listed above.

voterid needs to happen,but as things sit the practical way forward is to focus and push the citizenship question on the census

>>7666301

it's about counting wetbacks as population to gain extra undeserved representation (seats) in the house and in state legislatures.

>>7665955

>>7666401

If that actually happens I can see California (for one) lsing quite a few seats in the house.

If it actually happens.

wont do shit for the fruadulent allocation of seats in the state legislatures, but that's on us.

Pushing the issue loudly at the fed level would help