Q getting BTFO by a blcak Trump supporter. Perfect.
>strongest supporters
What if Trump comes out and personally, publicly (twatter) disavows Q?
Will you choose Q or Trump?
Qtards aren't Trump supporters if they choose Q over Trump … and Trump will be right to be rid of you kooks.
Seriously … that is cultish behavior.
>Maybe the plan would call for Trump to do that
Kek! this is exactly the mental retardation Qtards will use to justify not believing Trump when he disavows Q.
You're fucking lost to this psyop, anon.
>There is no way that I would vote for any candidate besides Trump. NO WAY!
And that is why Trump disavow Q … the negatives of being associated with this board FAR out-way the negatives of disavowing Q and pissing off a few nutjobs who will be inconsolable due to wasting their time believing this asshole Q.
>I would still trust POTUS if he disavows Q.
I bet that you will be the exception on this board.
Many will be (wrongly) mad af at Trump, given the amount of time and emotion they have invested here.
You'll see.
It will happen very soon … within the next 3 weeks.
Trump will NOT go into an election campaign tied to this ridiculous board … I promise you he won't.
BTW, that's all bullshit .. part of this psyop. Q+ is just a moniker given to Trump by Q, who runs this psyop .. and you believed it was Trump. That stupidity is your fault.
Was Chelsea sipping a nice cup of man piss when she was being interviewed?
Stupid fucking whore.
No. I'm just guessing based on election season approaching.
Q is the fortune teller. Keep giving Q your time and energy … he'll keep giving you jack shit.
just like every other fortune teller.
<Anonymous 8chan poster claims to work for POTUS
<Anon believes anonymous 8chan poster
<anon posts anonymous 8chan poster's claim as proof that anonymous 8chan poster works for POTUS
<Repeat multiple times for 2+ years.
<Wonder why nobody takes them or Q serisouyly
Unbelievable.
>There have been 32 zero deltas between Q posts and Trump tweets
How many zero deltas between Trump twats and the Krassensteins' responses? Thousands.
Q's "zero deltas" are bullshit "proofs".
Trump's official spokesperson has already disavowed any connection of Trump to Q … anons just ignored it or excused it as Trump not personally diavowing Q - again, weak excuse.
Trump does retwat a LOT of people, but never because of anything they twat related to Q .. your reasoning is that Trump must agree with every # that someone has listed on their twatter in order for him to retwat it - silly and impossible for Trump to keep track of all #'s on anyone's twatter that he cares to retwat.
>Q somehow has been able to regularly post seconds before POTUS tweeted.
This has never happened, when zero deltas are analyzed to the second. NEVER.
But Q makes excuses "delay due to two devices" .. and then never attempts to duplicate the zero delta (which he should be able to do immediately) to prove himself.
The need fro Q and anons to continue this lie is rather telling.
> the Republic has been restored to US
This has NOT happened … only one arrest and it was the most notorious pedophile to ever live .. and he died in Billy Barr's prison, with a bullshit explanation form Barr.
Nothing we see on a daily basis tells us that justice will be meted out and our Republic will be restored anytime soon.
>2018 will be GLORIOUS!
>Are you ready for arrests? (psoted by Q in October of 2018
Given these facts, I'm going with A) NOTHING
I'll take bets now.
>Now, you have 17 posts of quite questionable quality, so I'm not gonna argue with you.
This is the problem .
I've looked at 3 posts by Q that were supposedly posted before Trump, and the Photoshop on all 3 were so piss-poorly done that it was an obvious attempt at a bullshit "zero delta" . Why is bullshit like that needed or furthered by Q or anons? Why lie like that?
The Krassensteins were experts (or their bots were) at waiting for Trump to twat and then instantly responding .. always after a Trump twat. BUT, the Krassensteins' were never sitting right next to Trump when he twatted - in a position to duplicate a failed "zero delta" ..
Supposedly Q was next to Trump when his zero deltas failed, and yet Q never tried to duplicate it in the proper order (Q first, then Trump) .. Q always made excuses.
Logical thinking.
>53-47
>totally a great guess
Q "predicted" this senate outcome 7 days after the election .. you know that, right?
Just look at Q's post for this and compare the dates … if Q hasn't deleted it, that is.