>>7671005

so "batter" doesn't do the trick

worth a try

bakers have tried to unravel this mystery before

m was trying different things

>>7671040

ah wrong pic–have done that

ouch

u baking for a while?

bred will be maximally long

maybe 5 hours or more

coz of starting time

morning baker will probably catch this bred

will appreciate notes tho, if any

>>7671117

if sent in mid Aug 2019

we were scattered to the 4 winds

trying to figure out where to work

and what would happen on Sept 5.

(seems like a year ago, doesn't it?)

>>7671121

good discussion, lots to think about.

New Year is a good time for that.

>>7671135

all you say sounds plausible.

suspect timeline got moved back as well. not that patriots really "lost control" in the broadest sense but that they might have had to scramble to modify the plan in order to get things back on schedule. Coz certain things have to be done by a certain time.

BUT

have the sense that "the Plan"

is not just at the physical level

but comes ultimately from "on high"

which means that–as long as there is sufficient will on the part of those whose participation is needed–the outcome is a sure thing. But only sure if there is 100% commitment and moar.

Part of the plan is designed to make us grow in ways all participants never anticipated. We ain't just munching popcorn here–have had many experiences that require a lot of stretching (and from a lot of people).

Great opportunity tho–truly awe-inspiring. But also tough. Wouldn't miss it for the world, tho.

God bless you fam.

>>7671185

at least Notables Creek was short

unlike Captcha Hill–long & tortuous

>>7671195

could never get used to just voat and twatter.

voat sterile and twatter puerile.

endchan boards better–espec once resignation anon picked them up for qresear.ch.

>>7671165

there actually WAS a battle of the bewbs

last Spring

when the shills decided to turn into Puritans

and accused anons & bakers of being into porn

(bc of 'bewbs for bakers')

that was a strange campaign…..

Happy New Year to u 2 anon!

>>7671167

sounds like no baker all-nighters this shift

>note-taker

won't be me

looks like a 'discussion' bred so far

much superior to a shill bred

good to talk, go deeper, reflect sometimes

the other nite it was 95% shills til maybe 300, then bred people (laughter broke up the shills' momentum–laughter is the ultimate trump card).

then a bushel 'o news, you just never know.

Happy New Year if i miss ya tomorrow, doc.

>>7671289

>trying 4 chan

yeah, i did too

all the q discussions kept disappearing

hostile buggers

decided it wasn't worth the trouble

>>7671293

>half-chan newfags

content to remain so, kek.

>>7671312

i think it was the boomers and muzzies comment that elicited the 'shill' response, CanadianAnon. Kek.

Boomers did not create much of a baby boom–Greatest Generation were the ones who did boom-boom after WW2. That's yr competition.

>>7671217

>>7671333

Try to take this–and everything–with a grain of salt. This will pass and there will be something else down the road. No worries, o7.

>>7671365

i brought this up

not the same battle i was referring to….this 'battle' was after 8bit departed, last may/june. shills trying to shame anons, make the board a grim and humorless place to be.

>>7671253

>captcha hill, notables creek, 8chan deplatforming

won these battles–imo, a testament to the power of prayer & perseverance

sometimes, prayer is the only thing anons can do

so musta been a LOT of it

Here we are again

all of us together, fighting the good fight

so tired, can't stay

although it's a great almost-New Years bred

blessings to everyone,

G'nite & Godspeed.