Anonymous ID: 3a04bc Dec. 31, 2019, 3:23 a.m. No.7671913   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1924 >>2014

>>7671789 (lb)

Slide from what? We are discussing potentially important and earth-shattering things, if you think those are slides you have to provide a good argument why. This is not baseless as you may think.

Everyone from David Icke to Alex Jones knows stuff. Even Shirley MacLaine will tell you something about this.

ALL crazy?

Anonymous ID: 3a04bc Dec. 31, 2019, 3:32 a.m. No.7671937   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1951 >>2149

>>7671924

Your reaction to material posted shows just how serious a threat to your mental status quo this is. What you are watching is your own ego mounting a defense. Face it, we are not the first (civilization), we are not alone and we have never been.

Anonymous ID: 3a04bc Dec. 31, 2019, 3:41 a.m. No.7671970   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1978 >>2005

>>7671951

Nothing I ever post will change your fixed/unchangeable DOGMATIC opinion (evidenced by your profane words - like they prove anything but immaturity) until YOU decide to look at things more seriously. Then answer at least:

 

-Why does Q keep repeating EXPAND YOUR THINKING?

-Why does Q keep repeating how BIG this is - Bigger than even AUTISTS could imagine?

-Why did Q say that DEEPER WE GO THE MORE UNREALISTIC IT ALL BECOMES - CHOICE TO KNOW WILL BE YOURS.

-Why does Q (especially lately) warn against DOGMA (see above)

Anonymous ID: 3a04bc Dec. 31, 2019, 3:45 a.m. No.7671991   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2000

>>7671978

No, I don't want to waste my words further. It's your turn. Go on and explain to everyone our ancient history. Since you claim knowledge, it's only valid that you prove it.

Anonymous ID: 3a04bc Dec. 31, 2019, 3:56 a.m. No.7672019   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7672005

I want to (somehow) help them wake up. One of the "end bosses" of the Cabal control programs is activated when someone is PARTIALLY awakened and gets a few things wrong - then own dogma can be reinforced ad nauseum. "I know the truth about X therefore I must also be right about Y."

Anonymous ID: 3a04bc Dec. 31, 2019, 4:19 a.m. No.7672090   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2097 >>2099 >>2244

>>7672075

If the majority of anons are against finklefag, then his exercise of free speech is an obstruction of our own free speech (negative free speech). Then BO/BVs have the full right and duty to remove him from the top of breads.

fwiw I'm against finklefag's spamming.