Anonymous ID: 3e0ff7 Dec. 31, 2019, 6:08 a.m. No.7672605   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2631 >>2667

OK so let me fill everyone in:

shills fill the board with crap constantly and say 'ignore it all'.

then, at some point they get people to start smearing with tweets.

they want to cause problems so they pretend that anon have doubt about . . . issues of the board and beyond, which we do not.

and then they will attack the board with nonsense.

 

also they pepper the board with shills who try to direct the discussion and call people insults and posts posts that have operational messaging to other shills/bots.

 

Oh, and they are freaking out because all their efforts always fail . . .

 

carry on.

Anonymous ID: 3e0ff7 Dec. 31, 2019, 6:15 a.m. No.7672647   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2663

>>7672635

in the case of these opeational images another possible reason for them is tht the wiidth of the border woudl be a number of pixels, and the real data is that width. all the rest of it would be a throw away in that kind of scheme.

Anonymous ID: 3e0ff7 Dec. 31, 2019, 6:24 a.m. No.7672694   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

a phrase I heard recently was 'immediate responders'

it's a good one to know.

I hope we don't have to hear it a lot.

but if we do, then we'll be grateful for immediate responders.

but too quick is too quick, and the bad ones use a trick.

The song El Paso is about that, the marty robbins tune.

Anonymous ID: 3e0ff7 Dec. 31, 2019, 6:39 a.m. No.7672775   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2788

>>7672751

all of those things that you said.

vow safe?

vow safe and reveal what you really believe?

 

nonesense that is also a binding spell makes me angry at times.

but I temper it into a reveal so as to not scald the world with my boiling over.

 

but when children are told lies it might not ever be that they learn what it really is later?

vow safely, but not?

or do?

 

your bad effect, your good effect?

you can paint over it with babbling gurgles of idea

but

what you said, you are easily fooled if you believe any of it.

Anonymous ID: 3e0ff7 Dec. 31, 2019, 7:27 a.m. No.7673093   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7672921

give it back to them. the design of it was a chinese communist idea.

it might torpedo the trade agreement (just kidding).

 

It's my way of saying 'lets get rid of that ugly statue and put a good one in its place'

 

we can't give it back to them, it's too ugly. they wouldn't want it back.