>>7674047

Baker,

this notable seems pretty important. Also is a nice Qproof, or one of MANY 'coinkidinks'.

But right now, this proof is not visible to anons scrolling through notables.

>>7673809, >>7673965 Dan Scavino tweet: Trump Tweets MatterTrumps Tweets Matter

I suggest you make it two notables.

>>7673809 Dan Scavino tweet: Trump Tweets Matter

>>7673965 Dan Scavino tweet, at :17, 17secs vid

The second tweet by Dan seems like a nice gift for anons on new year´s eve.

Anons should see that in notables right away imo.

>>7674306

<posts muh jew spam

>>7674319

<says muh jew spam is done by jooos

see how clowns work.

>>7674370

>>7674663

Baker,

can you please confirm you changed that to have anons catch the meaning of this better?

>>7673809, >>7673965 Dan Scavino tweet: Trump Tweets MatterTrumps Tweets Matter

I suggest you make it two notables.

>>7673809 Dan Scavino tweet: Trump Tweets Matter

>>7673965 Dan Scavino tweet, at :17, 17secs vid

>>7674694

why not?

would be not that much efford (none) and would help anons that read through notables to get the meaning quicker/better.

imo notables should always be named in a way so that anons catch the info quickly.

just helps. and no efford for bakers at all.

>>7674705

Baker, why not making that easy change?

Would you rather like to have anons not catch the meaning of notables?

Are you one of the clown bakers?

Why is BO not checking bakers and preventing shills in the kitchen?

Do you fukken job, BO!

Or just go!