(pb notable) >>7674243 Baby momma using Burisma dealings in court

Is this it?

>how to introduce [evidence]

The public knows of sleepy joes corruption.

Insert baby momma lawsuit against 'WHERE'S' HUNTER.

1st. Paternity suit (public learns he got a stripper prego plus the kind of person he is)

2nd. Home purchased for 15K (more fishy stuff)

3rd. Burisma dealings

4th. evidence of international bribery scheme through various NGOs implicating thousands

question to law fags. If this judge is onto number 4, would they transfer the case to another judge or rule on it? What if this is the case that implicates a past President? What would the public see that judge doing? Or would it stay in the dark? Does this case have potential to lead into MIL tribunals?

its fitting that the left would be taken down by a mistresses child support case. her the ultimate victim