1/2 Was DJT's Ukraine call "PERFECT" legally? Was DJT "signaling that he was working off of a "Legally Perfect" document"? http://archive.ph/uH4Pz

@GitmoChannel

1/

This thread will present my hypothesis that Q may be showing us how language itself is used to enslave and control society.

Those aware of these fundamental flaws and ambiguity are able to make the system work for themselves and their agenda.

3:50 PM - 30 Dec 2019

2/

I'm limiting this thread to about 1/4 of what I'd like to say, because the remaining 3/4 focuses on Q drops that point to the work of a very controversial person which will hijack the conversation away from the message and put it on the messenger.

3/

To frame the thread, let's review some core themes from Q drops:

• words have mathematical values

• sentence structure/grammar/[mis]spelling matters

• language is coded

• drops are fractal

4/

By fractal, I mean the information in drops can apply to multiple domains and varying scale:

• surface level 'face value' interpretation

• occult/symbolic interpretation

• mathematical interpretation

• cross-referential interpretation

• …

5/

What if Q is teaching us to decode drops so that we can apply that fractal lesson at a larger scale: to language as a whole?

Is it possible that we have been taught a certain form of grammar and way of speaking that is inherently ambiguous and error-prone?

6/

If, from a young age, we are taught to think/speak/write using ambiguous language, we can always be exploited by those cognizant of this structural weaknesses [by design].

This is especially true in the arenas of:

• constitutions / governments

• diplomacy

• contracts / law

7/

Is it possible to write a mathematically unambiguous constitution? contract? regulations?

Yes!

Have we done that? Has anyone done that?

Shouldn't it be a core requirement to eliminate ambiguity?

Instead, we are stuck in a system of illusions [by design].

8/

The topic that started me thinking along these lines was Trump's repeated use that his Ukraine call was 'PERFECT'.

I think Trump was signaling that he was working off of a "Legally Perfect" document.

Legally Perfect is a concept used in law and diplomacy and is …

9/

a term which both legally and diplomatically means complete, finished, without defect, and enforceable. A perfect document is a document that is able to produce the consequences wanted by its author, and perfection is conferred on a document by its form

https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/viewFile/11567/12513 …

10/

This is a very strong hint that the diplomatic legal community is very aware of the concept of using well-formed language in a document such that there is zero room for misinterpretation.

11/

"A perfect document is a document that is able to produce the consequences wanted by its author, and perfection is conferred on a document by its form"

Legally perfect documents are their own courtroom - "the court of record".

>>7675949

2/2

11/

"A perfect document is a document that is able to produce the consequences wanted by its author, and perfection is conferred on a document by its form"

Legally perfect documents are their own courtroom - "the court of record".

12/

This concept sounds a lot like smart contracts on cryptographic blockchains.

All parties to a cryptographic smart contract know, a priori, all possible outcomes given all possible inputs/events, thus there is no need for a court.

I suspect this is where we are headed.

13/

In my research of perfectly legal documents, I came across someone who has a solution for this problem of inherently ambiguous language structure being used pervasively throughout all areas of law.

3 replies 3 retweets 14 likes

GitmoChannel

‏ @GitmoChannel

· 21h21 hours ago

14/

The more I researched this, the more I noticed the language of Q drops matching life events of this person and specific contextual ideas lining up with Q drops in very specific ways.

16/

To repeat an oft-used phrase by MJ12: "Message over messenger".

aside:

It is my personal opinion that Q3614: "Information warfare." was signaling that the TS_SCI_MAJIC12 account itself is engaged in "Information Warfare" against us, but I could be wrong, who knows …

17/

For those that wish to do their own research, these are the specific drops that I have matched up thus far:

Q1630: "Symbolism will be their downfall." (hint: textual symbols)

Q3063: "A Father's Love For His Children Knows No Bounds." (hint: life events)

18/

Q306: "Why was the Lord's prayer posted? Which version?" (hint: translations)

Q128: "There is an active war on your mind." (hint: exact phrase found in slides)

Q181: Everything has to be carefully crafted and tooled prior to release. (hint: carefully crafted)

19/

Q461: What makes a movie GOOD? GREAT actors? (hint: actors in a play)

Q3525: 93 dk

20/

Back to the discussion on language.

If there was/is an intentional effort to use language to keep people in the illusion, then what does (avail) history show?

When did this start?

Are there languages that are mathematically sound? Hebrew?

Were there others? Why did they die?

21/

Insightful comment on the Hebrew language:

@GresselNoam

I’m currently learning the Torah in Jerusalem in the Yeshiva system, an I’ve learned you can’t separate the Torah from the language it’s conveyed by. In hebrew, not only do letters have numerical value, but also have symbolic meaning associated with its shape…

22/

Excellent comment on the occult nature of grammar and language:

@ExplorerOneYT

And grammar (Grammary) in the 14th century was was akin to necromancy.

*Necromancy = talking to the dead to learn the future