Anonymous ID: e464ed Jan. 1, 2020, 8:18 a.m. No.7683429   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3460 >>3502

>>7683404

For a long time I wrote off this image as an artifact of Google Earth's image processing algos. Not any longer! This data fits with the other data about existence of submarine tunnels from the Pacific to underneath China Lake Naval Base far inland. It's not proof positive, but one of many correlations that, together, far exceed chance probability.

Anonymous ID: e464ed Jan. 1, 2020, 8:21 a.m. No.7683456   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

NOTABLE

 

>>7683343 Trump Proclamation on National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month, 2020 (signed 12/31/19)

 

Will this be the month that #PentagonPedophileTaskForce results are publicly announced by the WH and the massive satanic child trafficking / ritual abuse / murder operations come into public awareness?

God bless Patriots!

Anonymous ID: e464ed Jan. 1, 2020, 8:29 a.m. No.7683530   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7683353

>Follow the rulesโ€ฆ

There are no "rules", brainlet.

Bakers exercise editorial judgment.

Sometimes anons form a consensus.

Discernment required to ID anons vs. shills.

Sometimes bakers get it wrong, more often get it right.

Not every baker is trusted, true.

If important info isn't notabled, anons post again.

But not again, again, again, again, againโ€ฆ

The baker task is not an easy one.

It's not just the mechanical task of assembling notables based on "votes".

No votes here - this isn't Reddit or FB.

Baker has to select info based on relevance, merit, sauce, credibility, priority.

Sometimes they don't do a great job but often they do.

 

Why don't you just drop it.

Repost your info in different shifts instead of a screed at the baker just post the info that is so important to you, and a different set of eyes can evaluate it.

 

Stop picking on bakers. It just doesn't help.

Anonymous ID: e464ed Jan. 1, 2020, 8:58 a.m. No.7683777   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7683464

It's a way to look at the crumbs.

We STILL don't exactly know what Q means by markers.

It's possible that different messages are interleaved across multiple crumbs, ID'd by markers.

We don't know that's NOT the case.

We don't know one way or the other.

 

Example: Look up the word

MATTER

as tweeted by Scavino last night

in Trump Tweets Matter

 

About 50% of the occurrences of

matter

in the crumbs are in the context

matters of Nat Sec

 

Put all those lines together with their surrounding context and it paints a little picture and tells a little story concerning the POTUS' authority over matters of National Security, and actions he can or may take regarding same.

 

Best way to do these kinds of searches is download the .txt files of crumbs, concatenate them into one big file, and search with your notebad or gedit or nano or text processor.