Anonymous ID: 39b4f8 Jan. 1, 2020, 11:19 a.m. No.7684985   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5013

7684751 pb

^^ said we should shut up since causing "division" among alleged re-Elect Trumpers

Dude's a liar; but hey it's a new original-ish attack?

They did that on the 9/11 researchers. Keep them quiet

"IYour research bad for the movement"

"Stick to "bld. 7" fell but was not hit"

Nevermind Silverstein told the fire dept on TV "Pull it"

Can't stop stupid?

kek

So the tactic not that original, but a new tact for this project

Anonymous ID: 39b4f8 Jan. 1, 2020, 11:37 a.m. No.7685150   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5159

>>7684953

Will the extra day help us FREE Assange?

He's supposedly barely be hanging on, and drugged.

Probably have one of those torture doctors there to make sure he doesn't die & trigger the "dead man's switch" insurance?

Once everything is released by POTUS won't they then be free to kill him?

No value anymoar to his insurance policy?

Anonymous ID: 39b4f8 Jan. 1, 2020, 11:54 a.m. No.7685317   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5378 >>5381

>>7684981

"What does sauce for misspelling mean?"

Two screen shot … to display it clearly?

I do think it's streatching to make out that means so-and-so will be arrested first.

It's more likely consevative to say that it's shining like on Benghazi, which is in the mind of people now because of Iran's US. embassy sucessful defense by POTUS & military under his leadership

 

AH to HA, maybe?

the Strzok piece , to me, is biased because it does not mention the reply made by Barr, which explains Strzok's crimes and the reason for his dismissal very well.

The article is just a spinner / puff piece for Strzok's POV

And those things do work.

Liberals / progressives / communists are going to great lenghts to "prove" that Mueller's interpretation of the law

"YOu can obstruct an investigation of a crime before the crime is committed"

over Barr's much more reasonable and just interpretation- which ended the Mueller log-jam?

It doesn't hurt to put it in Notables

after it's remedied by a Side by Side showing the spelling change clearly?

Anonymous ID: 39b4f8 Jan. 1, 2020, 12:01 p.m. No.7685378   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5385

>>7685317

It's more likely conservative to say that it's shining LIGHT on Benghazi,

rather than it's predicting who will be arrested first.

Just think if HRC had won, their Communist Totalitarian take on the law, which they have been using to their own advantage for decades - would have moved to be unassailable.

Whao

"We barely missed being a 3rd world World forever"

Anonymous ID: 39b4f8 Jan. 1, 2020, 12:14 p.m. No.7685488   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7685320

Re-posted when they don't make it Notable is perfectly good.

Notables aren't as sacrosanct as that.

Eventually you'll find a Baker which will post it?

Otherwise, yes, maybe their is a conspiracy of Bakers - that would be the suspicion.

We've seen it before; it's not outlandish to imagine?

?

Anonymous ID: 39b4f8 Jan. 1, 2020, 12:23 p.m. No.7685574   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5590 >>5608

>>7685013

Sorry but it was a controlled demo

 

This is why they fight for every inch.

Even though "Bld 7" "Lehman Bros" bld is the stupidist argument there is;

The official version is even stupider.

 

My point was this:

Silverstein announced that they "pulled it?"

It was announced.

 

This is like the idiots who won't read the Ukraine Pres. / Trump transcript and keep telling you, anyway, what's in there.

THEY ARE STUPID