Company That Paid Paul Pelosi, Jr. Hundreds Of Thousands Gave Bill & Hillary Millions

The Biden and Pelosi families, along with others in the orbit of the Obama administration … and corporations and nations who were in their sphere of influence … before Trump’s election, comes to light.

Today, the one and only, Paul Pelosi Jr. is back in the spotlight.

If you recall, Patrick Howley, the dogged, gumshoe investigator from National File, has been working with Paul Pelosi Jr’s ex to expose all the messed up … ‘stuff’ Paul has allegedly done, to children, mind you.

An example? Sure:

‘Karena Feng, a Taiwan-born woman living in San Francisco, alleges that Paul Pelosi Jr. was “abusive” to her, that he forced her to have an abortion by threatening her life, that he conducted foreign business while claiming to be a representative of Nancy Pelosi, and that he engineered Child Protective Services’ seizure of Feng’s four children. Feng supports her claims with text messages and documents presented in this article below.’

You can read the rest of the article, and see the white papers referenced in the excerpt HERE.

Today, The Gateway Pundit is reporting: ‘Shortly after his mother Nancy Pelosi became the first woman speaker, Paul Pelosi Jr., was hired by InfoUSA for $180,000 a year as its vice president for Strategic Planning in 2007.

Pelosi kept his other full-time day job as a mortgage loan officer for Countrywide Loans in California. And, unlike all of the other InfoUSA employees, Paul Pelosi did not report to work at the company’s headquarters in Omaha.’

In what is becoming a constantly reoccurring theme among the children of powerful Washington brokers, Paul allegedly had no prior experience that would qualify him as a logical pick for the job.

The Pelosi’s do, however, have a mutual connection between them and InfoUSA: InfoUSA is owned by a big time HRC & WJC backer, Vinod Gupta (pictured below with HRC and Warren Buffet)

https://www.dcclothesline.com/2020/01/01/company-that-paid-paul-pelosi-jr-hundreds-of-thousands-gave-bill-hillary-millions/

The Dangers of Elite Groupthink

The Washington Post recently published a surprising indictment of MSNBC host, Stanford graduate and Rhodes scholar Rachel Maddow.

Post media critic Erik Wemple wrote that Maddow deliberately misled her audience by claiming the now-discredited Steele dossier was largely verifiable – even at a time when there was plenty of evidence that it was mostly bogus.

At the very time Maddow was reassuring viewers that Christopher Steele was believable, populist talk radio and the much-criticized Fox News Channel were insisting that most of Steele's allegations simply could not be true. Maddow was wrong. Her less degreed critics proved to be right.

In 2018, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), and the committee's then-ranking minority member, Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), each issued contrasting reports of the committee's investigation into allegations of collusion between Russia and Donald Trump's campaign team and the misbehavior of federal agencies.

Schiff's memo was widely praised by the media. Nunes' report was condemned as rank and partisan.

Many in the media went further. They contrasted Harvard Law graduate Schiff with rural central Californian Nunes to help explain why the clever Schiff got to the bottom of collusion and the "former dairy farmer" Nunes was "way over his head" and had "no idea what's going on."

Recently, the nonpartisan inspector general of the Department of Justice, Michael Horowitz, found widespread wrongdoing at the DOJ and FBI. He confirmed the key findings in the Nunes memo about the Steele dossier and its pernicious role in the FISA application seeking a warrant against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

In contrast, much of what the once-praised Schiff had claimed to be true was proven wrong by Horowitz – from Schiff's insistence that the FBI verified the Steele dossier to his assertion that the Department of Justice did not rely chiefly on the dossier for its warrant application.

When special counsel Robert Mueller formed an investigatory team, he stocked it with young, progressive Washington insiders, many with blue-chip degrees and resumes.

The media swooned. Washington journalists became giddy over the prospect of a "dream team" of such "all-stars" who would demolish the supposedly far less impressively credentialed Trump legal team.

We were assured by a snobbish Vox that "Special counsel Robert Mueller's legal team is full of pros. Trump's team makes typos."

Yet after 22 months and $32 million worth of investigation, Mueller's team found no Russian collusion and no evidence of actionable Trump obstruction during the investigation of that non-crime. All the constant media reports that "bombshell" Mueller team disclosures were imminent and that the "walls are closing in" on Trump proved false.

Mueller himself testified before Congress, only to appear befuddled and almost clueless at times about his own investigation. Many of his supposedly brightest all-stars, such as Lisa Page, Peter Strzok and Kevin Clinesmith, had to leave his dream team due to unethical behavior.

https://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-dangers-of-elite-groupthink/

Fluoride In The Water

Are you drinking fluoridated water?

According to statistics from the CDC, fluoridated water reaches more than 204 million U.S. residents— or just under 74 percent of the population on public water systems. In 1999, the CDC proclaimed community water fluoridation as one of 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century.

Water fluoridation began in 1945 when Grand Rapids Michigan became the first city to fluoridate their water based on the idea that it reduced tooth decay rates. However, excess fluoride causes dental and skeletal fluorosis, and dental carries. But that’s not all. In 2014, a study published in the journal Lancet, declared Fluoride a neurotoxin, affecting the brain. Other studies show that fluoride, as fluorosilicic acid, in the drinking water to affect every organ system in the body, including behavior.

Fluoride in the public water supply is not natural, elemental fluorine found in soil. Rather, it is both sodium fluoride, rat poison, and hydrofluosilicic acid, or HFSA, a toxic byproduct of the fertilizer industry. Stannous fluoride can be found in over-the-counter toothpaste and mouthwash. It’s often used as a protective treatment during dental checkups.

We are told that the small amounts of fluoride added to tap water is not harmful. However, no one is monitoring all the sources of fluoride that make up an average daily exposure. Few people understand that as fluoride accumulates in the body and brain, it is not necessarily excreted.

The consumption of these forms of fluoride contributes to thyroid disease, cancers, the development of skeletal and dental fluorosis,[1] pineal gland calcification, and lower IQ.

The Case Against Fluoride

In 2016, the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and coalition partners filed a citizen petition asking the EPA to ban the deliberate addition of fluoridating chemicals to U.S. drinking water under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). In 2017, EPA denied the petition and later made a motion to dismiss. In response, FAN and coalition partners filed a lawsuit challenging the EPA’s denial of their petition. On December 30th, the federal court denied EPA’s motion to dismiss. This allows the citizen petition to be heard in a federal court on fluoride neurotoxicity in the New Year. See timeline.

In 2020, will EPA finally be held accountable for decades of neglect with respect to protecting citizens from the deliberate addition of a known neurotoxic substance to the public drinking water?

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2020/01/fluoride-in-the-water.html