7685608 pb

Dude! we'll fall for that shit in 2004, but it's too late now. "Cat's out of the bag" and easy to see iall that by the eyes of the youngn'

Fuck off. You're interested enough in me to track my alleged IP , and let me know you're doing that, but lack the interest in the actual topic enough to muster a cogent counter-argument other than "delusional"?

Proved by EVIL shill.

This one must have a dog in the game.

If it's so allegedly "delusional" what is it scared of?

>>7685472 pb

7 lehman bld. destruction was different technique from Towers. Also, famous vid of it was staged and likely faked. Friend was there. Vid doesn't show what he witnessed. Large beam flying up and hitting the Telephone bld, next door Guess that would more blatantly lack any congruence with a "fire did it" explanation, which was shitty poor to begin with - and continues to be an open wound to the "Official engineering report" explanation/ "storytime" - Which report was delayed and put off for years, with no explanation. Hoping their non-explanation would be forgotten.

We didn't forget.

You lost the narrative now. Remember, "We are the News" now.

Isn't that why you desperately needed to shut down this free speech Forum.

You're the one with the hate speech, BTW