So instead of challenging the information you choose to create a safespace?
Imagine coming to the chans and being scared to see some JQ posting.
Why would you need to filter?
Doesn't it feel like home?
Let me guess, you've always been a faggot.
No, that is what Tarrant the kike was used for.
Whose manifesto was never proven to be posted on the chans in the first place.
Learn the history faggot.
So you mean the passive language to lull the population used by media establishment and political "elites" to look like they are the good guys is the proper etiquette?
Maybe if the mind was wired to not care what words are use but the context which they describing, then people would be more free to communicate.
How many people are forced into constraining social norms to converse with?
What if this idea of proper is just a set of arbitrary rules designed to limit speech and create social taboos of dismissal?
There is a trend that people think soft language is the path to enlightenment while at the same time they wouldn't lift a finger to help the homeless outside of donated to some kike charity. Which uses that same soft language to lull its victims into giving them money which benefits big money that has exploited human nature for far too long.
>Israel
So if someone quoted Q posting, "Saving Israel for last"
They'd be filtered?
Huh..
Haha, so instead of disclosing there are already moon bases.
The plan is to just create a public event in which they are built.
Talk about 40/60.
What a classic.
Ahahaha, this one is unaltered?