Anonymous ID: a122df Jan. 1, 2020, 6:16 p.m. No.7688770   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>7688742

 

Yeah, I heard that too and think you might be onto something. It's been rattling around in my head since he said it….it was very clear, strong, and decisive. It may be this or it might be a code word to indicate a new phase of the battle…..I dunno.

 

NOTABLE

Anonymous ID: a122df Jan. 1, 2020, 6:33 p.m. No.7688933   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8948 >>8981 >>9044 >>9292

23 Brings the Pain

 

So I had a thought and if any Anon had the same, please jump in here….

We are looking at it wrong….

We have been saying "23" as in "twenty-three". I think it should be "2" and "3" bring the pain. Why? A standard Military Tribunal is made up of 6 Officers. 1 Judge, 1 Prosecutor, 1 Defender, and at least 3 Officers in a Jury Panel. So, 6 total….but only 2 and 3 bring the pain. The Prosecutor Charges, The Judge oversees, and the Jury of 3 Make a decision of guilt. SO…2 and 3 bring the pain.

Thoughts?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courts-martial_of_the_United_States

Anonymous ID: a122df Jan. 1, 2020, 6:42 p.m. No.7689014   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9056

>>7688981

 

Yeah, it just seems like that would not have been leaked to us unless it was meant to lead us somewhere…..nothing seems to lead to proper dates, so I shifted gears. The questioning of Judge K at the hearing would lead me to believe that the supreme court may be asked to BLOCK an attempt at Tribunals. This was verification, to me anyway, that they would NOT be able to do so. And the numbers fit this.

Anonymous ID: a122df Jan. 1, 2020, 7 p.m. No.7689155   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>7689123

 

I think that is very possible [2019] DS indictments. I also wonder if it was meant [2019] as a target to eliminate. Meaning as of midnight last night 2019 was finished or eliminated. The Twat drops this evening seem more aggressive than before. Have we turned to the Offense?