Anonymous ID: c394ac Jan. 2, 2020, 7:16 a.m. No.7691860   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1864 >>1906

>>7691844

Grisham is taking a strictly legal perspective which is not crazy

In some jurisdictions the penalty for seeing a picture of a man screwing a 12 year old is harsher than for getting caught screwing a 12 year old

In some it is much harsher

There is a longstanding legal ideology challenging the rationality of child porn and indecent exposure penalties that doesn't sound crazy at all once you read about it

Anonymous ID: c394ac Jan. 2, 2020, 7:20 a.m. No.7691883   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1918

>>7691864

If you seriously investigate pedophilia and why it is so often minimized or laughed off within the legal system, you will read all sorts of discussion, some evil and some rational

It is important to know what the enemy is thinking and to be prepared for their arguments and hard cases