Anonymous ID: 72f461 Jan. 2, 2020, 1:25 p.m. No.7694530   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4538 >>4549 >>4562

>>7694486

"Religiotards" is obviously used to denigrate those of faith, because those of faith became lazy with their apologetics. You might find a debate interesting. Understand, though, that as with any man, the debaters are fallible, and you must use discernment to discover the truth for yourself.

 

Your world view is not as coherent as your derogatory tone suggests. I hope you find the truth and the light, anon. He is there for you and would love to have you back.

Anonymous ID: 72f461 Jan. 2, 2020, 1:39 p.m. No.7694668   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4716

>>7694644

>I've deliberately not argued with you because I don't care. And I have told you so.

You don't have an argument, so of course you wouldn't try. But to say you don't care? As shown by your childish "I know what you are but what am I"? Who are you fooling, child?

>Consider the amount of crazy killers with that exact minds set.

Did you know they also breathed? And ate food? And used the restroom? All of these coincidences sure are nefariousโ€ฆ

>As long as you believe in said Demons.

The question isn't whether or not I do, but why you claim to.

Anonymous ID: 72f461 Jan. 2, 2020, 1:46 p.m. No.7694734   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4762

>>7694716

>You are trying really hard to make me debate you. It ain't happening faggot.

You poor child.

>Did any of the things you mentioned have any direct influence on their kills ? as opposed to what I stated.

Space before a question mark? Curious. What is your native language?

>I, don't "claim" anything. I say I don't believe in Demons or God. It's a fact.

There you go with that pesky "fact" word again. Words have meaning.