It's an unsupported unverified assertion. We have no corroborating evidence or other sources.
It's interesting but we don't know whether it is actually true or not.
Thank you for all your hard work, glad you had a good vaycay and welcome back!
I know what you mean about posting long update posts, kek.
There are many of these really important threads that we see and dig but we only have the ability to get so far without access to certain databases (we have only open-source). So then the thread either ends or attention does elsewhere, but that doesn't mean that thread was irrelevant, I just put it in a mental file and when something else pops up that thread wiggles and tickles mah brain and can pick up that thread and connect it to other things. I am reticent to go on a meme-spree for something so huge that we can't verify at this time, since especially now -and I know I'm not the only one experiencing this- it is very important moment pregnant with so much tension and hammers about to drop. Timing is important, and unless Q gives a nod or a direction OR we find something solid, I can't go meme-crazy on this, specifically the nuke part.
Does that make sense?
>buffet of badness
I like that!
Not necessarily. Just like there are 'night people' there are 'day people' too. That includes annoying 'early morning day people'. It's actually been studied and some people's brains work best at 8 am others at 11pm. All the rest is projection.
Has anyone even asked themselves:
WHY would Hezbollah leader be in Iraq at the outside of the base?
WHY would Quds commander be in Iraq at the outside of the base?
Both at the same time?
Same place?
Does that make military sense?
Attacking an anti-terrorism joint-base would get ___ reaction with POTUS?
Would you put your leaders there, when expecting a harsh response?
Could you afford to lose both of those leaders?
Is anyone thinking this through at all?
I'm not offering conclusions for a reason. I have questions, and I don't see anyone else questioning.