Anonymous ID: 0de025 Jan. 2, 2020, 8:05 p.m. No.7698693   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7698607

>speak

The graphic said POTUS was not expected to speak tonight. Some anon's text left out the word not.

Mentioned this in LB - nobody saw it I guess.

Anonymous ID: 0de025 Jan. 2, 2020, 8:09 p.m. No.7698742   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8820

>>7698610

Announcing a cyber-op?

Never seen that before!

Anons have read the papers studying cyber-ops as a war tactic and recommending its use.

Wonder if this account is authentic USAF?

Is there a way to tell?

Anonymous ID: 0de025 Jan. 2, 2020, 8:36 p.m. No.7699116   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9201

>>7699096

As someone posted earlier,

POTUS can basically do anything for 30 days without congress.

And bearing in mind we're in a declared state of emergency, POTUS actually has authority to do whatever he needs to, whenever he needs to.

 

So the tweet raises a spurious concern and may be seen as purposeful Dem spin.

Anonymous ID: 0de025 Jan. 2, 2020, 8:43 p.m. No.7699191   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7699141

Ask yourself:

What happens when you put metal in the microwave oven?

Right: electric currents are induced in the metal, causing significant heating due to resistance losses.

In other words a generalized beam would have different effects on good vs. poor conductors of electricity.

And what frequency does a DEW operate at? You don't know? I don't know either.

Why did the houses with smart meters burn but those without, didn't? Smart meters contain solid state components that are subject to failover when high induced voltages are present. (Something induced currents in the electric distribution system … fire isn't selective like that).

 

I think you're a little quick to dismiss this hypothesis which has been extant since the Santa Rosa fire in California.

I'm not saying I know the answer, because a lot of information we'd need to draw firm conclusions is missing. But you are too quick to jump to conclusions and dismiss something that a lot of analysis has been done on.