Anonymous ID: 6d53ed March 23, 2018, 2:07 p.m. No.770969   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1065

>>770782 (old bread)

>So does this mean the bill provides Q with secure comms? Or does it enable HIM to hear US loud and clear?

 

[SECURE_COMMS_ACT] = secure communications activated

[SIG_5:5_READ] = signal five of five read(y) BUT without the "Y", meaning not ""go" or "yes" for now.

And today Q added in his new post the then missing [y]!!

Anonymous ID: 6d53ed March 23, 2018, 2:38 p.m. No.771280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1290 >>1295 >>1340

>>771145

Good post.

Have a look back at this:

Feb 21 2018 20:34:05

Q

!UW.yye1fxo

453

SEC_TEST_1_

SEC_TEST_2_

SEC_TEST_3_

SEC_TEST_4_

SEC_TEST_5_

[DEVICE_1_X]

[SECURE_COMMS_ACT]

[SIG_5:5_READ]

[ ]

Q

 

READ might have been "ready" but(!) with the "y" missing.

Today Q gave us the [y].

Anonymous ID: 6d53ed March 23, 2018, 2:46 p.m. No.771366   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>771340

>SIG(na)l 5 (of) 5 READ[y]

>Once broadcast, however it's broadcast, there can't be any interruptions. Hence the strength test not long ago. Stage_5:5[y], Stage set and READ[y] to go!

 

Yes, yes, yes!