>>7711790
How the F was this not notable?
Especially after the use of the image in the New Bread post?
Another possible 'Rod of God' sighting doesn't make notables? They used to in years prior.
>>7711790
>>7712022
>>7712021
>>7711790
>>7711826
Take the BDanon part out of it. That was just one last little part, and mostly unrelated. The main thing was the images/tweet.
I understand that it may not be "Rod of God" or whatever. Hence the language of "possible".
Nonetheless, it is important enough to be researched by anons, if they so choose - thus it needing to be in notables IMO.
I am just trying to keep with the standard.
I first heard of this potential weaponry through the Q research boards a couple years ago.
For those that find this topic interesting and want to add to their research, it definitely should be notable.
No butthurt here. Just stating my opinion and found it curious, borderline deceptive, as to why it was not made notable.
Sorry. I will try to type it all out without spacing and not make it easier to read for others. No more posts on this because of the unintentional sliding. Not a shill, but comments like these are awfully shill-like. Discrediting based on spacing. Interesting.
o7