Anonymous ID: 57df4c Jan. 4, 2020, 10:14 a.m. No.7713370   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3522 >>3781

>>7712603, >>7712427 Images and video of unknown light/trails over Iraq 03 Jan 2020 CTDig

 

>Acceleration due to gravity at 2000 km up is 5.68 ms-2

>Rod starts accelerating, force of acceleration due to gravity increases as it falls, pretty soon it's falling pretty damn fast.

>2004 article says speed at impact could be

>36,000 feet per second.

 

BUNK

 

What is the terminal velocity of a bowling ball? (ref: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-terminal-velocity-of-a-bowling-ball)

 

v = √ 2mg / ⍴AC

 

Where:

v = Terminal velocity,

m = mass of the object,

g = acceleration due to gravity,

⍴ = density of the fluid through which the ball falls,

A = cross sectional area of the ball,

C = drag coefficient.

 

C = 0.5 for a sphere (drag coefficient)

 

460 km/hr or 285 mph. (ref https://www.google.com/search?q=285+mph+to+fps&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS879US879&oq=285+mph+to+fps&aqs=chrome..69i57.3511j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8)

 

285 mph = 418 foot per second

 

The 'figure' given in the OP is completely ignoring terminal velocity - and as a result is an order of magnitude (of orders of magnitude) off.

 

It's a fuckin slide people. It was a slide all godamn night last night, it's a slide all day today, it'll be a slide all this year if you continue to fucking notable it.

Anonymous ID: 57df4c Jan. 4, 2020, 10:47 a.m. No.7713652   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7713522

You're the asshole.

 

It's basic fucking math - and an even more basic level of digging to disprove your fucking slide - if you were serious, then it takes <30 seconds to fucking disprove with even the most basic 'digging' (look at the fucking links you faggot. I supplied them because it IS so fucking easy to do) tools.

Anonymous ID: 57df4c Jan. 4, 2020, 10:59 a.m. No.7713781   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3794 >>3875

>>7713688

no, not flouride. Intentional slides.

 

When shit gets notabled because of a relentless effort of reposting for the last 24 hours. When that shit gets 'digs' that are nothing but speculation and unsourced quotes with a vague year citation - and that's it. When shit can be disproved with simple google searches and quora questions/answers. Then the shill gets shitty because they're 'just a generalist, not a mathmatician or physicist' as an excuse

>>7713370

>>7713522

 

Yeah it's intentional.