>>7716557
Yeah.
I was thinking along those lines on January 1st.
#7683777 at 2020-01-01 17:58:55 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #9832: Scavino for the Sauce! Edition/
>>7683464 PB
It's a way to look at the crumbs.
We STILL don't exactly know what Q means by markers.
It's possible that different messages are interleaved across multiple crumbs, ID'd by markers.
We don't know that's NOT the case.
We don't know one way or the other.
Example: Look up the word
MATTER
as tweeted by Scavino last night
in Trump Tweets Matter
About 50% of the occurrences of
matter
in the crumbs are in the context
matters of nat sec
Put all those lines together with their surrounding context and it paints a little picture and tells a little story concerning the POTUS' authority over matters of National Security, and actions he can or may take regarding same.