They hate "q" because they hate the truth.
If "Q" research was untrue?
They wouldn't attack it.
It's not "Q" they don't like; it's the truth they hate.
Stop. I doesn't harm anything.
Your gonna pull a barbra streisand effect
You don't realize how popular the UFO / New Age material .
Not many want politics straight. Too stressful
You guys ran off Kappy too. I' ll never forget it.
7717266
Why? if the step son is a coward he shouldn't have join the military!
What a joke.
We see you.
"October Surprise", engineered by H.W. Bush with help from Stephen Halper
https://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=BushBook&C=16.2
How coincidental.
Also CNN 's first success. 24 "news" Entertainment.
I hope CNN goes down, totally fails.
must be a C-A cut-out
Not Notable
Fucking NYTime Propaganda, as usual
Why would a Q research Baker give promenience to their putrid drivel
They don't source their shit.
Anons can't get published in Noabled WITH citations / sources.
But yet if NYTimes has weak to BS to non-existent sources. "Oh that's cool make them Notable. They are the New York Times, no one will doubt"
How many times will they get caught lying before you stop listening to those fucks
They are actual perps / actors in the bid to take down POTUS; why would they be a trusted source on ANY matters to do with President D.J. Trump?
They are also quiet on so many things they shouldn't be quiet on, if they were a real news source.
BUT THEY AREN't. That's why they are called "FAKE NEWS"
I looked up "fake news" in the dictionary and it said "New York Times" "Washington Post"
POTUS doesn't even allow it in the White House.
Total liars, Headed by a pedo