>>7717633 pb

>>7717697 pb

Then annotate it as such, with commentary?

Anons should make a cogent comment on the link

For instance - is there an actual credible source for this story?

What does POTUS say about it?

For instance in this case they claim DJT ordered the strike out of anger.

POTUS himself said that it was NOT for vengence,

He specifically said that.

He said he did it because they were planning something.

Who are you going to believe? NYTimes liars or POTUS

If you put it in Notables but don't put what DJT's word was/is on the subject - you mislead people

You cant expect everyone to hate the NYTimes.

In fact millions of people consider it more credible than POTUS!

People can read NYTimes anywhere, they don't come here for NYTimes.

Also , anons shou

>>7717697 pb

ALSO there's no necessity to "let people know" what the assholes are saying.

That's like "Well I watch the TV so I can keep an eye on what they are doing with commercials"

That's unnecessary.

If their lie was documented with a graphic , maybe?

But just by itself cold? That's stinks.

It's foul.

>>7717735

Wow. that's terrifying. I wonder if that's a cover for something else they did that was actually bad?

For Obama, the crook, Sole.. was a "good guy" since they were working together.

Since ObamHussain was in charge in '15 - and he was the Commander in chief, the terrorists gets treated as a friend

Also, Check the reaction of Sole..'s USA patrons right after he was wiped out? They are all crying? setting up protests? flipping out?

Rice said something stupid like "Intel wouldn't let us get him" Pelosi said it was wrong since it would make us a target.

Yet Many are opening showing that they took the side… of the thug anti-USA guy.

Wow.. Openly showing that.

"They are stupid"

>>7718216