I'm going to go out on a limb and say this is the guy who wrote the book. Names and dates are changed, but pretty much his credentials match fairly well with those of the author.
If you want something interesting to explore, look at the debates that were going on in the 1960's between uniformitarians and catastrophists.
>7720452
Okay. This is getting lame, now. Wanna know why?
>The 'gist' of this book is that a cataclysm occurs about every 6500 years.
This is false. The author is trying to coordinate this to match up with tradition "Biblical" timelines. It was ignorance like this that cost catastrophists in the debates, which eventually led to false theories, like Darwin's theories about "evolution" via "natural selection", being taught to children in school without mention of alternative theories which were based in factual evidence, but smeared as if it were solely based on scripture.
>This occurs during a pole shift and the skin (crust) of the planet violently shifts.
Again, no. If you're going to take their word for it, the last "pole shift" happened 700,000 years ago. Supposedly. Not 6,500. Again, both dates are false. In fact, the entire "pole shift" is a misrepresentation of data.
Want a clue as to what caused this "phenomena"? When an arc occurs, like a lightning bolt, for example, the current reverses direction multiple times in a fraction of a second. It was electrical currents that caused the "flips" which we see in the sea floor as it was spreading. The next faulty assumption, when analyzing that data, is that the plates were spreading at the same rate as they are today. Which led to the assumption that this type of thing happened slowly and periodically, not instantaneously. The continents did spread much quicker than assumed by uniformitarians, but it was not due to a "polar flip". It was caused by a celestial body (most likely the moon) that crashed into our atmosphere and transformed our planet in a single catastrophic event.
>It happens quickly, but is beyond devastating.
Yes. It did. But it already happened. That type of event isn't likely going to happen again. Also, worth noting, as shocking as this suber-secret book may sound to some, the idea of Biblical catastrophes were already proposed in Velikovsky's 1950's book, Worlds in Collision. Much more fascinating. And unlike the Chan book, Velikovsky actually proposed close encounters with various celestial bodies as the likely cause of these intense "natural" disasters. So, in reality, the "Adam & Eve" book may have been commished by clowns with the intention of trying to make the Chan book seem more credible than Velikovsky's work, by "banning" the book, shortly after it's "publication", in order to make it seem more infamous, even though they fully intended to declassify it later on.
>c_a is where conspiracy theories are thought up
and apparently /qresearch/ is where they take 30+ posts to try to force their outdated theories down people's throats. Ugh.
Not like there's anything important going on in the world right now that they and their cronies wouldn't want us to pay attention to. I feel bad wasting 3 posts on this topic, tonight. Just wanted to emphasize, I guess.