Anonymous ID: 86d3f8 Jan. 5, 2020, 2:53 p.m. No.7725554   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5883 >>6080 >>6135 >>6149

'Doesn't make any sense': Ratcliffe suspicious of US embassy official who contacted Papadopoulos

 

The U.S. embassy official who sought out former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos during the 2016 presidential contest has generated some curiosity among Republican investigators in Congress. Terrence Dudley, a defense attache at the U.S. Embassy in London whom Papadopoulos believes was spying on him, was reportedly interviewed by the federal prosecutor appointed by Attorney General William Barr to examine the origins of the Russia investigation.

 

Republican Texas Rep. John Ratcliffe, an ally of President Trump and who is a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said this indicates U.S. Attorney John Durham is looking into the Obama intelligence set for evidence of an anti-Trump plot. "That's a sign that John Durham is looking at the fact that this may include Obama administration officials beyond law enforcement — perhaps to include our intelligence community, folks like [former CIA Director] John Brennan," Ratcliffe said Sunday on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures.

 

Dudley met Papadopoulos in London multiple times in 2016, according to Politico, and was interviewed by special counsel Robert Mueller's team investigating possible coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign. Papadopoulos alleged Dudley and his colleague Greg Baker, whom Papadopoulos thought were from the Defense Intelligence Agency, were spying on him. Both men have denied the accusation, claiming they made contact only out of personal curiosity. “We approached him from a more fascinated standpoint trying to figure out what his game was,” Dudley told the Daily Caller. "Who’s funding him to be here [in London]? How does he actually get away with doing that?"

 

Ratcliffe doesn't buy Dudley's explanation. "Officials at our U.S. embassies overseas going to meet with a campaign official for the Trump campaign — not in their official capacity. But the explanation that they give is, 'Just out of personal curiosity.' It's not their job, but beyond that, it doesn't make any sense," he said Sunday. The FBI's counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign began in late July 2016 after Papadopoulos bragged to an Australian diplomat that he heard the Russians had damaging information on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. An academic named Stefan Halper, who is reportedly an FBI informant, and an undercover FBI agent posing as his assistant with the name Azra Turk also met with Papadopoulos.

 

Papadopoulos served 12 days in federal prison for lying to FBI investigators about his contact with people linked to Russia during the 2016 campaign. The FBI's counterintelligence investigation, dubbed "Crossfire Hurricane," was wrapped into Mueller's investigation, which was unable to establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. In an audit released last month, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz said he found no evidence that the genesis of the Russia inquiry was motivated by political bias as Trump and his allies have alleged. But both Barr and Durham publicly disagreed with that conclusion.

 

As part of his inquiry that has been criticized by Democrats as a ploy to attack Trump's political enemies, Durham is investigating what Brennan told former FBI Director James Comey and other officials about an anti-Trump dossier, compiled by British ex-spy Christopher Steele, which made a series of accusations about Trump and his associates and their ties to Russia. Ratcliffe said he is confident Durham will provide the American people "a better picture of, really, how the Democratic administration before this one targeted President Trump and was aided by Democrats who paid for Russian disinformation, to try and frame this president before he ever got into office."

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/doesnt-make-any-sense-ratcliffe-suspicious-of-us-embassy-official-who-contacted-papadopoulos

 

Intel probe puts CIA’s Haspel in a bind

The review led by U.S. Attorney John Durham is making life uncomfortable for America’s cautious spy chief.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/27/intel-probe-cia-gina-haspel-089834

Anonymous ID: 86d3f8 Jan. 5, 2020, 3:08 p.m. No.7725702   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5943 >>6123

Donald Trump Jr. Shows Off AR-15 With Hillary Clinton On New Magazine

 

President Donald Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., on Saturday, posted a photo of an AR-15 with Hillary Clinton on the magazine behind prison bars. Trump Jr. posted three photos of the gun, with the caption “Nice day at the range. @rarebreedfirearms and @spikes_tactical adding a little extra awesome to my AR and that mag…” Trump Jr. is an avid hunter and outdoorsman and often posts photos of his guns or of himself on hunting or fishing trips.

 

President Trump and his supporters have continued to chant “lock her up” at rallies when Clinton’s name is mentioned, something that was heard at nearly every rally when Trump was running for president in 2016. Trump Jr. has been campaigning for his father, traveling around the country to speak at different events to help raise money for his father’s re-election campaign.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/05/donald-trump-jr-ar-15-hillary-clinton-magazine/

Anonymous ID: 86d3f8 Jan. 5, 2020, 3:42 p.m. No.7726073   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6131

Speaker Pelosi Threatens Possibility of Armed Conflict Against U.S. Department of Justice…

 

Think about all of the media panel discussions on gun ownership you have watched; segments where second amendment advocates were ridiculed by media pundits for daring to bring up the possibility of the U.S. government using arms against U.S. citizens who hold opposing political views… There are hundreds of recent reference points. Now consider, earlier today U.S. House of Representatives Legal Counsel, Douglas Letter, argued in court it would be a possible remedy -for a conflict between branches of government- for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to order an armed “gun battle” between the House and the United States Department of Justice. Yes, this actually happened.

 

At the same time as national Democrat political candidates are arguing to remove the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners, the highest ranking Democrat in the United States; a person only two succession-steps away from the presidency; is arguing in DC federal court the House could begin an armed conflict against the Dept. of Justice.

 

BACKGROUND – Federal appeals court judges aggressively grilled lawyers for the Justice Department and the House of Representatives Friday in a pair of intertwined cases that could have major implications for Donald Trump’s presidency and the Democrats’ ongoing efforts to remove him from office. During back-to-back hearings spanning about three hours, the judges drilled in on the House Judiciary Committee’s dual quests to learn special counsel Robert Mueller’s grand jury secrets and to secure testimony from Don McGahn, Trump’s former top White House lawyer. The two hearings were overseen by two partially overlapping, three-judge panels.

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/01/03/speaker-pelosi-threatens-possibility-of-armed-conflict-against-u-s-department-of-justice/

 

Judges spar with Democrats, DOJ in impeachment doubleheader

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/03/impeachment-justice-department-democrats-trump-court-093088