Anonymous ID: 2ef8ca Jan. 6, 2020, 12:39 p.m. No.7733763   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3836

>>7733646

R v Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697 is a landmark freedom of expression decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the court upheld the Criminal Code provision prohibiting the wilful promotion of hatred against an identifiable group as constitutional under the freedom of expression provision in section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is a companion case to R v Andrews.

 

Background

James Keegstra was a public school teacher in Eckville, Alberta. In 1984, he was charged under section 281.2(2) of the Criminal Code [now 319(2)] ("Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group")[1] for "promoting hatred against an identifiable group by communicating anti-Semitic statements to his students".

 

During class, he would describe Jews as a people of profound evil who had "created the Holocaust to gain sympathy." He also tested his students in exams on his theories and opinion of Jews.

 

Keegstra believed in a Jewish conspiracy and held anti-Semitic views. This conspiracy theory is the notion of world domination by Jews and their plan to annihilate Christianity. He has asserted that the current historical information being taught in universities and schools is a trap set by the Jews to mislead the public. He claims that the education system has failed because of their awareness regarding Jewish conspiracy with the Holocaust.

 

So, (((they))) managed to make it illegal to say that in Canada.

 

If you needed confirmation of the conspiracy, there it is.