Anonymous ID: 8f8329 Jan. 6, 2020, 6:58 p.m. No.7737031   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7038 >>7059

>>7736982

Whether or not this baker is comped is debatable, but for whatever reason, the last few days they have been siding with shills screaming things are not notable that 6 months ago were hugely notable. Not sure why that is, so I am just saving the notables the bakers refuse to bake. Just because they don't agree with everything is no reason to block notables that include facts. Period.

Anonymous ID: 8f8329 Jan. 6, 2020, 7:04 p.m. No.7737081   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7127

>>7737059

Actually, he stated his case quite well. The onus is on the baker to explain why it is not notable. This has been going on a few days now on a lot of topics. I pretty much give zero fucks what the bakers put in…it just helps new anons play catch up. It is all kept.

Anonymous ID: 8f8329 Jan. 6, 2020, 7:17 p.m. No.7737187   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7737127

Thank you for actually reading it. THAT is my point. When multiple anons think something is notable, they probably all looked at it. If it is something that might apply, then FUCKING ADD IT TO NOTABLES. Because thank goodness we have a notable Planefag report of tankers training in Oklahoma City and a plane flying circles SW of there oh…..and don't forget how important the OU cheerleader is! I'm not knocking the Planefag…that's what I do most of the time….point is, If you include that useless information (those are extremely common events in OKC), why the hell can you be judge and jury on something you don't have answers about yourself. Add it and people will stop asking for it.