Anonymous ID: 825b9b March 23, 2018, 7:41 p.m. No.774452   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4491 >>4533

>>774128

Retards still in control here I see. You are completely wrong. He cannot line item veto. This board is filled with ignorant cultist like you. Ignorant non-thinking mob of pure cancer. Disgusting.

Anonymous ID: 825b9b March 23, 2018, 7:47 p.m. No.774515   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4523

>>774395

They are consistently and overwhelmingly the most violent and psychotic of all prison populations. There is a reason these freaks have throughout history been charitably called sick. They are demons.

Anonymous ID: 825b9b March 23, 2018, 7:52 p.m. No.774553   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4589

>>774533

Clinton v. City of New York, is a legal case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the line-item veto as granted in the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 violated the Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution because it impermissibly gave the President of the United States the power to unilaterally amend or repeal parts of statutes that had been duly passed by the United States Congress. The decision of the Court, in a six-to-three majority, was delivered by Justice John Paul Stevens.

 

Now go neck yourself turbonigger.

Anonymous ID: 825b9b March 23, 2018, 7:58 p.m. No.774621   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4659

>>774595

So no line item that you claimed was settled law from Clinton mumble mumble something?

 

KILL YOURSELF ASSHOLE

 

Take the L. Admit your loss. Move on dickhead.