Anonymous ID: b23aa4 Jan. 7, 2020, 5:40 a.m. No.7739797   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9803

>>7739776

I have no sauce either way. I do remember much discussion about it and a seeming consensus that since no one could prove that it was a young O it was basically dropped.

Anonymous ID: b23aa4 Jan. 7, 2020, 5:50 a.m. No.7739836   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7739804

I was here when it was first posted when chaos ensued. Board broke into two factions. Neither denied the photo or that, yes it looks like it could be a young Obummer. The division was over the proof of identity. Since that could not be decided, the arguments remain undecided. Think "what is the keystone".