Account suspended. Shoulda' screencapped whatever it was.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/862739/Baltic-Sea-Anomaly-ufo-alien-ice-age-glacier
Nah. The only way a burning plane can produce that much light is if the fuel tanks are ripped wide open and fuel is hemorrhaging out and burning. You can seen burning bits breaking off from it at 6sec. I think the increase in brightness at 27sec is due to the plane (what's left of it) picking up speed at it nears the ground and the increased drag forces ripping the fuel tanks open wider.
>blamed on pro-Russia Donbass volunteer militias
Yeah. There was an intercepted phone call for the guys who did it. You can hear the remorse in their voices when they resized they made a mistake. There was never any question as to what happened. But I'm not surprised ZH is running this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbyZYgSXdyw
>You dont think a missile caused it?
Dunno. But it'd be a hell of a coincidence for it to happen at a time like this if it WASN'T shot down with something. Our guys are surely watching Tehran very very closely right now. So if there was a missile launch they would have seen the heat signature and we'll be hearing about it soon. They might also have some old-school anti-aircraft guns around their capital. I don't think Iran would have shot it down intentionally. Maybe some operator was nervous (worried about an American bombing raid after that rocket attack today) and shot without thinking.
>How rude.
>Tits or gtfo
Are you sure? Think about that age-range of people use that phrase.
>missile would cause it to come down in pieces most likely, no? in flight explosions scatter debris field over wider area, no?
>sabotage,mekanical failure,faulty maintenance possible too.
Could be either.
To be a mechanical problem it'd have to be a pretty big one to start leaking fuel like that. Maybe a turbine blew apart and sent blades through the fuel tanks or lines.
On the other hand, a passenger jet is fairly big. It wouldn't necessarily be blown to smithereens by a missile.