>>7748745

Vid from 2005

Taste sauce before serving

>>7748862

That seems like a lot of crew for such a small jet.

737 85-215 seats depending on configuration.

170 passengers?

Seems like a normal commercial head count for such a plane.

Like a SouthWest flight, but smaller bird.

But TEN crew?

2 pilots

8 crew in back of plane?

When have you EVER seen this many crew on a plane this size?

There aren’t even TEN jump-seats on a 737.

Where do they all sit/stand?

spoopy

>>7749315

Illogical.

170 on a 737 means non-VIP seat configuration.

This was a commercial flight.

Again - where would you even put TEN crew on such a small bird?

>>7749310

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737

https://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Ukraine_International_Airlines/Ukraine_International_Airlines_Boeing_737-800.php

>>7749337

>Reddit is that way ->

Glad you know how to get there.

The numbers are illogical.

If it was a normal commercial flight as claimed – and as numbers suggest – 10 crew is outsized.

Ergo, spoopy.

If (you) want to quibble about other spoopiness such as why the plane was in the air in the first place, go ahead.

But don’t use that as a redirect from another bit of analysis.

That’s clown type shit.

>>7749365

Now that makes more sense

>>7749365

>>7749310

> 2+4 active

> 4 inactive hitching a ride

Still highlights the normalness of a typical commercial flight.

Not a VIP flight.

MANIFEST NEEDED.

Who gets the black box flight recorders?

>>7749403

>>7749413

No doubt it’s a sketchy flight.

Most likely VIPs on it.

But the plane itself and the numbers being reported do NOT paint that picture.

That’s my whole point anon.

>>7749438

Isn’t it amazing how much one finds oneself in agreement with other people when (you) stop trying to beat them down?