The theory of general relativity predicts the existence of closed time-like curves (CTCs), which theoretically would allow an observer to travel back in time and interact with their past self. This raises the question of whether this could create a grandfather paradox, in which the observer interacts in such a way to prevent their own time travel. Previous research has proposed a framework for deterministic, reversible, dynamics in the presence of CTCs, where observers in distinct regions of spacetime can perform arbitrary local operations with no contradiction arising. However, only scenarios with up to three regions have been fully characterised, revealing only one type of process where the observers can verify to both be in the past and future of each other. Here we extend this characterisation to an arbitrary number of regions and find that there exist several inequivalent processes that can only arise in the presence of CTCs. This supports the view that complex dynamics is possible in the presence of CTCs, compatible with free choice of local operations and free of inconsistencies.
"The theory of general relativity predicts the existence of closed time-like curves (CTCs), which theoretically would allow an observer to travel back in time and interact with their past self. This raises the question of whether this could create a grandfather paradox, in which the observer interacts in such a way to prevent their own time travel. Previous research has proposed a framework for deterministic, reversible, dynamics in the presence of CTCs, where observers in distinct regions of spacetime can perform arbitrary local operations with no contradiction arising. However, only scenarios with up to three regions have been fully characterised, revealing only one type of process where the observers can verify to both be in the past and future of each other. Here we extend this characterisation to an arbitrary number of regions and find that there exist several inequivalent processes that can only arise in the presence of CTCs. This supports the view that complex dynamics is possible in the presence of CTCs, compatible with free choice of local operations and free of inconsistencies."
I will explain.
If you travalaed to the future. you will not see it. Nor will you see the direct path for you to do so with this;
The future is not here. it is there.
You are NOW.
So if you travaleled to the future, you are still NOW, and the future is right there.
RIGHT THERE.
But most of you flinch. Because of REASONS.
Those reasons.. are put everywhere-
You will most of the time have some reason.. REASON to decide just a TAD something else.
That flinch.. at that exact moment you flinch is when the future is about to happen.
Traveling in the "Future" is not what it seems.
Beeing now can be a hard thing if you act only of the subconsiouss act.
What is that act?
What is.. your dayli information of what is about to happen?
Always a plan.. always a thing there. and that.
But not so much here.
Forget there, be here and now and travel to the future.
Paradox = solved.
The future is now my padawan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNJ2Vrjx3ek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNJ2Vrjx3ek
"
Alot of people dont understand is the dimensional levels.
That we are on the third dimension now - and there are other dimensional levels.
like wavelenght patterns, the first three dimensions are X, Y -Z axis - and then Time is the fourth.
It keeps going up to about eleven dimensions.
But we`re not talking about that.
They see the Cosmos as Music.
There is nothing but music going on everywhere.
Harmonics.
The musical scale as the wave and the notes are seperated are exactly the way the dimensional levels are seperated.
It`s frequency.
There is nothing but music going on everywhere.
Just harmonics.
It`s frequency.
Very much like consolidating.
Change your wavelength and you shorten the channel getting an entirely different image.
And if you do the same with Consiousness and you end up in a different part of the universe.
Yet they are all superimposed over eachother.
If we are to be able to move from this dimension into the very next higher frequency.
It`s a different Earth.
The musical scale as the notes are seperated is exactly the way the dimensional levels are seperated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNJ2Vrjx3ek
Our proofs have demonstrated
that non-trivial time travel between multiple regions is
consistent with the absence of a logical paradox as long
as once the outputs of all but two regions are fixed, at
most one-way signalling is possible.
The most significant result of our work is our discovery of distinct non-trivial quadripartite process functions
which are compatible with the presence of CTCs. This
demonstrates that when multiple local regions communicate with each other in the presence of CTCs, there is a
broad range of communication scenarios which still allow
freedom of choice for observers in each region without the
development of a logical inconsistency such as a grand father paradox. The range of distinct communication scenarios which are consistent with the presence of CTCs
proves that the way CTCs allow multiple observers in distinct regions to communicate is not incredibly restricted
by a conflict with locality, free will and logical inconsistencies. As a result, we have demonstrated that there is
a range of scenarios in which multiple observers can communicate without causal order in a classical framework.
Acknowledgments. We thank S. Staines